From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y] ALSA: hda: Fix cached processing coefficient verbs
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:33:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722113348.1150850-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026072011-plastic-headphone-afbf@gregkh>
From: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>
[ Upstream commit f67be28fdf8b5d31ac1cc1152bb17250f9f8f513 ]
Intel HD Audio defines Coefficient Index and Processing Coefficient as
separate audio widget controls in the Audio Widget Verb Definitions:
Coefficient Index selects the coefficient slot, while Processing
Coefficient accesses the value at the selected slot.
hda_reg_read_coef() selects the slot with AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, but
then uses AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX for the value read. That reads back the
selected index instead of the coefficient value. hda_reg_write_coef()
has the same issue and builds the value write from AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX
instead of AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF.
This only affects the regmap coefficient cache path used by codecs that
set codec->cache_coef. Direct coefficient helpers already use the normal
SET_COEF_INDEX followed by GET_PROC_COEF or SET_PROC_COEF sequence, which
is likely why this has not been noticed widely.
Use AC_VERB_GET_PROC_COEF for cached coefficient reads and
AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF for cached coefficient writes.
Fixes: 40ba66a702b8 ("ALSA: hda - Add cache support for COEF read/write")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/DB9023BF2920BA99+20260707132419.1731342-1-raoxu@uniontech.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c b/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
index 39610a15bcc988..9b786cec8f1e13 100644
--- a/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
+++ b/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int hda_reg_read_coef(struct hdac_device *codec, unsigned int reg,
err = snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX << 8);
+ verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_PROC_COEF << 8);
return snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, val);
}
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int hda_reg_write_coef(struct hdac_device *codec, unsigned int reg,
err = snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX << 8) |
+ verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF << 8) |
(val & 0xffff);
return snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
}
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 9:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ALSA: hda: Fix cached processing coefficient verbs" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-22 11:33 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722113348.1150850-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=raoxu@uniontech.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox