From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D943909A3 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=81.169.146.170 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784882470; cv=pass; b=XOkCjD9cKXbH9Ec0NYehwT/am0OpPLpLGR24bZ6TqzrI2D4ec1abf4UCyEvXMvpun+i2Myb5iP2L/2lq6L6tT5Aj7r7xOO2Y0KUgbeWLbbrJaAh0XCq12WKjoFgIN7GwcY5NlEiNQZbZ987QVY/o+T3uHD8M5sJr7BVP0iEwqyA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784882470; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qzM8GUXCgxZajg79iEdmDxseMT4fA+4rVbXp6LUCbdY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NbwkcDWGjNHRDdkCMYbqJKhYHQt4Cq1xbaHEI2QFsZb5IJZTzrYsLPuUza6orOCfKj9d5Vk3MDoxu0yLA1MuSmTwZ8Tf3PFNZwIrHZSneJEg+rkYpJdchGJej95KFQMuR95BE0YXNSkhg3JN6v7BdB8tRzNupok20Exc5PzR3Fs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=hartkopp.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=hartkopp.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b=HEuE81fO; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b=juKDQn51; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=81.169.146.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=hartkopp.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=hartkopp.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b="HEuE81fO"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b="juKDQn51" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1784882288; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=jMNrGs36QTiP56CS0cS9J+5iOyArANuZ+bjueapb9rzHCreYAc1CARKIMKezt0IwoY 4usaqtLu6JzjeniEyJYAjdG9BYq017xFRVjIl2VYTfyoYIXdsExkOh96orsF8BkGy/72 4SPpvAP/O2rWuNWmJXj7IHwFIt1BPj26tH1jMlB91EynD4FXSeGer3spc98AtJfXzxtI k1r9uI8h4ElHrVPz1pPwA+8t56hTaR4d0pIOxGHvjsUFz2vSLqaercKPlIJjbDjdmNG3 kkTE2yaONakUDyYcC7RT8hOAQmw2rnooKY3WDOlVYekhXPf+E8qLpFuMM3BCyZYKvUvN 7sCg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784882288; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=iX/goZ4SF0ZzpCX26cB8C7oGVPF623lKcob8dClrWN4=; b=VlXC7sndpYfxnC+Pxewlm8h/ewulvkxOErEKTmlm0diCbCgeDO9c+CjiaiSHs6PXD+ 6vFnyXfU7sJEnvEPMnToDmlsUK3S9abOXOHauSHcDDKpThgOsxoop5AjSy9YJqF24azb sOwrLseR/nSZwDNkajFYJkro4aV47ELiij5kEX6SwrkZf1gH6qtHDEn3qDNk5FYkc5MP zgIBIBKER/PDCiJQUWnp8e1OmQluVfXON5aHQM0Mo6FR58jH8EJeArIPMyJC1/w94qvW Z62zqjkG19tsjVkEb5uw03mWsEn0VOXNvTSvCaz1cPucQXcx1wK/TsJYgSnUl56sQ8Pz Azzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo02 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784882288; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=hartkopp.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=iX/goZ4SF0ZzpCX26cB8C7oGVPF623lKcob8dClrWN4=; b=HEuE81fOujmWiU0xK6OG9y133680avjy9ZSh/Ir7cMJ/6Y5u68jt+mfcZbjFl8/P63 wQJhAJlgPV3q9vQPoc//O//NmjteqZQ+4toR6d211PRQjRFlrvoLHlV2QhNhdQ3QJDJV E95PmfpSC2omHv1LCrlM6c2vtRWkcDx0zO8/z9yIZvPUEXI7ytSfOvRAx9nIkgJMDRXU Ph5hOhksSgijJ49j2eqNC9cSFIKcoqXkGOSHwBgGKRu0GfwyJFQX+6fYoQItYYYclwOw n44NsS1KkkSbCaxXFu8KbUPN7J/Q0QPKuDsmksYAmNr3n7TUjixMfLsxa/lrbygyW9Lv A8NQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784882288; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=hartkopp.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=iX/goZ4SF0ZzpCX26cB8C7oGVPF623lKcob8dClrWN4=; b=juKDQn51hUZ+ooNBTD/FjpEsqiZdYOvzTi4Io2VO5OSYlyFSwyTavxP09//Py9PeMj nTTVc3IQYrR4PKvgdODQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2MHfkW8eP4Mre39l357AZT/I7AY/7nT2yrDxb8mjH4JKvMdQv2tRkI16oOSW1Ti/f4PoH8=" Received: from vivo.lan by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 55.5.6 SBL|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id K5281926O8c7rQ5 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:38:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Hartkopp To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oliver Hartkopp , Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: [PATCH 6/9] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20260724083756.12430-7-socketcan@hartkopp.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <2026072039-residue-friction-b0c4@gregkh> References: <2026072039-residue-friction-b0c4@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" commit d59948293ea34b6337ce2b5febab8510de70048c upstream. sashiko-bot remarked a problem with a concurrent device unregistration in isotp.c which also is present in the bcm.c code. A former fix for raw.c commit c275a176e4b6 ("can: raw: add missing refcount for memory leak fix") introduced a netdevice_tracker which solves the issue for bcm.c too. bcm_release(), bcm_delete_rx_op() and bcm_notifier() relied on dev_get_by_index(ifindex) to re-find the device for an rx_op before unregistering its filter. If a concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER has already unlisted the device from the ifindex table, that lookup fails and can_rx_unregister() is silently skipped, leaving a stale CAN filter pointing at the soon-to-be-freed bcm_op/socket. Hold a netdev_hold()/netdev_put() tracked reference on op->rx_reg_dev from the moment the rx filter is registered in bcm_rx_setup() until it is unregistered in bcm_rx_unreg(), and use that reference directly in bcm_release() and bcm_delete_rx_op() instead of re-looking the device up by ifindex. Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260707094716.63578-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol") Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714-bcm_fixes-v15-8-562f7e3e42da@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp --- net/can/bcm.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index 1263822..eb09818 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ static void bcm_rx_unreg(struct net_device *dev, struct bcm_op *op) /* mark as removed subscription */ op->rx_reg_dev = NULL; + dev_put(dev); } else printk(KERN_ERR "can-bcm: bcm_rx_unreg: registered device " "mismatch %p %p\n", op->rx_reg_dev, dev); @@ -914,17 +915,14 @@ static int bcm_delete_rx_op(struct list_head *ops, struct bcm_msg_head *mh, * Only remove subscriptions that had not * been removed due to NETDEV_UNREGISTER * in bcm_notifier() + * + * op->rx_reg_dev is a tracked reference taken + * when the subscription was registered, so it + * stays valid here even if a concurrent + * NETDEV_UNREGISTER already unlisted the dev. */ - if (op->rx_reg_dev) { - struct net_device *dev; - - dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(op->sk), - op->ifindex); - if (dev) { - bcm_rx_unreg(dev, op); - dev_put(dev); - } - } + if (op->rx_reg_dev) + bcm_rx_unreg(op->rx_reg_dev, op); } else can_rx_unregister(sock_net(op->sk), NULL, op->can_id, @@ -1447,7 +1445,15 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg, bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk); - op->rx_reg_dev = dev; + /* keep a reference so that a later + * unregister can safely reach the device even + * if a concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER has + * already unlisted it by ifindex + */ + if (!err) { + op->rx_reg_dev = dev; + dev_hold(dev); + } dev_put(dev); } else { /* the requested device is gone - do not @@ -1820,16 +1826,14 @@ static int bcm_release(struct socket *sock) * Only remove subscriptions that had not * been removed due to NETDEV_UNREGISTER * in bcm_notifier() + * + * op->rx_reg_dev is a tracked reference taken + * when the subscription was registered, so it + * stays valid here even if a concurrent + * NETDEV_UNREGISTER already unlisted the device. */ - if (op->rx_reg_dev) { - struct net_device *dev; - - dev = dev_get_by_index(net, op->ifindex); - if (dev) { - bcm_rx_unreg(dev, op); - dev_put(dev); - } - } + if (op->rx_reg_dev) + bcm_rx_unreg(op->rx_reg_dev, op); } else can_rx_unregister(net, NULL, op->can_id, REGMASK(op->can_id), -- 2.43.0