From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34F441D630 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=81.169.146.221 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784888052; cv=pass; b=bxNFkYH+waXY33Fd5Pb5XnIcjmYxxOpaIUulg2HQhVCXC31Vjin/99RIv945AbpYvkzsogADYegf1WB3kjxTkzmIGIv64vwM4eDgaEOaFbGmvuweahAmPBKiDINHKBbtxdRjlqiUeSXqlaM1aKRiu/s0wwfkhrDcriVI7F7hCVU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784888052; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BefUt36UzTX1Xz3PFofRiRYuWY7dvmH68A+YS1dG6Dc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vnay01vLMa/BD6nIqa8VqEVmmn5CfJSrMHxKXDL+vMlJnMGVuvA0tkte5qgiPoXBsCs2zeFt25FLMSlRpRJWwCLV/NwN7LnII1yQUUjyC6MMjb7BuWGOED8Kx1EigVAyghYb2Pt7SW3/qHwSFL9QUaKkr8ZNDYL6BMNs3Gw0qOA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=hartkopp.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=hartkopp.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b=FzsB19Kq; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b=N8T/kOLT; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=81.169.146.221 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=hartkopp.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=hartkopp.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b="FzsB19Kq"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hartkopp.net header.i=@hartkopp.net header.b="N8T/kOLT" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1784888046; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=DJYwy0DjKeGWruJjG2zlalmay8HkY8EyqzPl9mKYSdc+9zqLIi9z7iEYiTzEw0WqLb LnYximoh7gIC69ChEamOqX4t/D6Uc2k9zKI0hGsJXRdJPSQ9m2S9Lde+sThevI3buhuM JGW9rk6ExO40BM2PFTJK60J8Rd+6ob5j2Frodm7IE1CeFQgSK1D761Xu8JN5J0lhEFVX mp7W+Nm7j/AC+e+2YOHWkePNy0r5XebKBWLxw5SpLhdK3jWXxF00IdhhpqijhHw9tiTJ LDPMkPIJZ4sIoY3vYqCE66aGrvNtGAgXdiwn0vYwQuLCo1JMHbFZ5752jXwU4WAhYLIE XleQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784888046; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=0cfVLfI8ZcYjh44KKEIrbkJYAgs6V65Tuq1l7zIu5Kk=; b=c0iXKEx0eRw2l61zmm47HgYxG5j3gOOGdTfHzLYqNaZRlSfIRvDSdLhQC/7V0SI3H3 HEWPj5fal9miD7ZVC5KK9Z6DDi07Aetc0PJXIvIK4ftpLLIEWY08E6d4dlbczZbzLZMf tyJTBHK5urrzraJdUBnzTydTwxAcRcunv6dn2mOndksHWdRTRvMMt2IPgwBpJNyGcdbe ZCwnau/jT9gO9aCaBNs6YGwgrJx5r2n+KtP/uSJ3liL9VM8Qk16k68qS9/dEp0/sDy00 jCN4uU/xRfD/+T9Flglf6kGoJhbf4ogBvVaUp5ni9o/FUPJFzTX6CfAtL9YLGszTRwTw RyYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784888046; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=hartkopp.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=0cfVLfI8ZcYjh44KKEIrbkJYAgs6V65Tuq1l7zIu5Kk=; b=FzsB19Kquf4IIaY46nyeAOvr0gsONsPm3H/DbbGZ/dHbvLWXjVyHZ1xIgYEjNcttR1 4254z1nnQ7SlnmJybOOuIyQGUSaehFQTzAjxSw0hOxIl3Jl77loCTOidTmloqqLC8qOA fBvondyInEHLa4/65zlbRw6bTJrjgnYffJFvR1/c6NjsSdKonw6z0lCkwshybGnr6cq7 mEuAT+gKaj+YX972E3sfHp+Wye+/wAh6tWEigZkmv0i+WpJmkfR78FEjGGiq66gpUwzX kBKMaYzScv5g30qdV87HZPECBCTqGkQeKXuSy47N2khyuTzdoD+/+QbRa6x3Cr3UL5sr WRjQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1784888046; s=strato-dkim-0003; d=hartkopp.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=0cfVLfI8ZcYjh44KKEIrbkJYAgs6V65Tuq1l7zIu5Kk=; b=N8T/kOLT7WD0FbdKpUjiaeyi9w8OtGTTaqULzRlwILXmz//LUv+pRk41DmvSyYfLSX i5445LYb6NBMo5zTFPBw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2MHfkW8eP4Mre39l357AZT/I7AY/7nT2yrDxb8mjH4JKvMdQv2tRkI16oOSW1Ti/f4PoH8=" Received: from vivo.lan by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 55.5.6 SBL|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id K5281926OAE5tFD (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:14:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Hartkopp To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oliver Hartkopp , Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y 3/9] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20260724101342.16000-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260724101342.16000-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net> References: <2026072037-bagginess-bluish-c081@gregkh> <20260724101342.16000-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" commit e6c24ba95fc3f1b5e1dcd28b1c6e59ef61a9daa5 upstream. KCSAN detected a data race within the bcm_rx_handler() when two CAN frames have been simultaneously received and processed in a single rx op by two different CPUs. Use atomic operations with (signed) long data types to access the statistics in the hot path to fix the KCSAN complaint. Additionally simplify the update and check of statistics overflow by using the atomic operations in separate bcm_update_[rx|tx]_stats() functions. The rx variant runs under bcm_rx_update_lock to prevent races when resetting the two rx counters; the tx variant runs under bcm_tx_lock and only needs to guard its own counter's overflow. As the rx path resets its values already at LONG_MAX / 100, there is no conflict between the two locking domains (bcm_rx_update_lock vs. bcm_tx_lock) even for ops that use both paths. The rx statistics update and the frames_filtered update in bcm_rx_changed() were previously performed in two separate bcm_rx_update_lock sections. For an rx op subscribed on all interfaces (ifindex == 0), bcm_rx_handler() can run concurrently on different CPUs, so a counter reset by one CPU between these two sections could leave frames_filtered larger than frames_abs on another CPU, producing a bogus (even negative) reduction percentage in procfs. Update the statistics in the same critical section as bcm_rx_changed() to close this gap, which also removes the now unneeded extra lock/unlock pair around the traffic_flags calculation. Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol") Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714-bcm_fixes-v15-4-562f7e3e42da@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp --- net/can/bcm.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c index ffd492a..cca495c 100644 --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct bcm_op { int ifindex; canid_t can_id; u32 flags; - unsigned long frames_abs, frames_filtered; + atomic_long_t frames_abs, frames_filtered; struct bcm_timeval ival1, ival2; struct hrtimer timer, thrtimer; ktime_t rx_stamp, kt_ival1, kt_ival2, kt_lastmsg; @@ -216,10 +216,13 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) list_for_each_entry_rcu(op, &bo->rx_ops, list) { - unsigned long reduction; + long reduction, frames_filtered, frames_abs; + + frames_filtered = atomic_long_read(&op->frames_filtered); + frames_abs = atomic_long_read(&op->frames_abs); /* print only active entries & prevent division by zero */ - if (!op->frames_abs) + if (!frames_abs) continue; seq_printf(m, "rx_op: %03X %-5s ", op->can_id, @@ -241,9 +244,9 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) (long long)ktime_to_us(op->kt_ival2)); seq_printf(m, "# recv %ld (%ld) => reduction: ", - op->frames_filtered, op->frames_abs); + frames_filtered, frames_abs); - reduction = 100 - (op->frames_filtered * 100) / op->frames_abs; + reduction = 100 - (frames_filtered * 100) / frames_abs; seq_printf(m, "%s%ld%%\n", (reduction == 100) ? "near " : "", reduction); @@ -267,7 +270,8 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_printf(m, "t2=%lld ", (long long)ktime_to_us(op->kt_ival2)); - seq_printf(m, "# sent %ld\n", op->frames_abs); + seq_printf(m, "# sent %ld\n", + atomic_long_read(&op->frames_abs)); } seq_putc(m, '\n'); @@ -277,6 +281,24 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ +static void bcm_update_rx_stats(struct bcm_op *op) +{ + /* prevent overflow of the reduction% calculation in bcm_proc_show() */ + if (atomic_long_inc_return(&op->frames_abs) > LONG_MAX / 100) { + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_filtered, 0); + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_abs, 0); + } +} + +static void bcm_update_tx_stats(struct bcm_op *op) +{ + /* tx_op has no reduction% calculation - use the full range and + * just keep the displayed counter non-negative on overflow + */ + if (atomic_long_inc_return(&op->frames_abs) == LONG_MAX) + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_abs, 0); +} + /* * bcm_can_tx - send the (next) CAN frame to the appropriate CAN interface * of the given bcm tx op @@ -328,7 +350,7 @@ static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op, struct canfd_frame *cf) spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock); if (!err) - op->frames_abs++; + bcm_update_tx_stats(op); /* only advance the cyclic sequence if nothing reset currframe while * we were sending - a concurrent TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX means this @@ -473,12 +495,9 @@ static void bcm_rx_changed(struct bcm_op *op, struct canfd_frame *data) { struct bcm_msg_head head; - /* update statistics */ - op->frames_filtered++; - - /* prevent statistics overflow */ - if (op->frames_filtered > ULONG_MAX/100) - op->frames_filtered = op->frames_abs = 0; + /* update statistics (frames_filtered <= frames_abs) */ + if (atomic_long_read(&op->frames_abs)) + atomic_long_inc(&op->frames_filtered); /* this element is not throttled anymore */ data->flags &= (BCM_CAN_FLAGS_MASK|RX_RECV); @@ -713,25 +732,29 @@ static void bcm_rx_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data) op->rx_stamp = skb->tstamp; /* save originator for recvfrom() */ op->rx_ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex; - /* update statistics */ - op->frames_abs++; - /* snapshot the flag under lock: op->flags/op->frames may be updated - * concurrently by bcm_rx_setup(). - */ + /* op->flags/op->frames may be updated concurrently by bcm_rx_setup() */ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock); + rtr_frame = op->flags & RX_RTR_FRAME; - if (rtr_frame) + if (rtr_frame) { + bcm_update_rx_stats(op); + /* snapshot RTR content under lock */ memcpy(&rtrframe, op->frames, op->cfsiz); - spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock); - if (rtr_frame) { /* send reply for RTR-request (placed in op->frames[0]) */ bcm_can_tx(op, &rtrframe); return; } - spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_rx_update_lock); + /* update statistics in the same critical section as bcm_rx_changed() + * below: frames_filtered must never be checked/incremented against a + * frames_abs snapshot from a concurrent bcm_rx_handler() call on + * another CPU for the same (wildcard) op, or frames_filtered can end + * up larger than frames_abs. + */ + bcm_update_rx_stats(op); if (op->flags & RX_FILTER_ID) { /* the easiest case */ -- 2.43.0