From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y 3/8] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:25:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724102558.17056-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724102558.17056-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net>
commit 12ce799f7ab1e05bd8fbf79e46f403bfe5597ebc upstream.
Stage new CAN frame content for an existing tx op into a kmalloc()'d
buffer and validate it there, mirroring the approach already used in
bcm_rx_setup(). Only copy the validated data into op->frames while
holding op->bcm_tx_lock, so bcm_can_tx() and bcm_tx_timeout_handler()
can no longer observe a partially updated or unvalidated frame.
Add a missing error path for memcpy_from_msg() when copying CAN frame
data from userspace.
Also move the kt_ival1/kt_ival2/ival1/ival2 updates in bcm_tx_setup()
under op->bcm_tx_lock, and read kt_ival1/kt_ival2/count under the same
lock in bcm_tx_set_expiry() and bcm_tx_timeout_handler(), closing the
torn 64-bit ktime_t read on 32-bit platforms.
Fixes: c2aba69d0c36 ("can: bcm: add locking for bcm_op runtime updates")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714-bcm_fixes-v15-6-562f7e3e42da@hartkopp.net
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
---
net/can/bcm.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 24aca35..0f435d6 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct bcm_op {
struct canfd_frame last_sframe;
struct sock *sk;
struct net_device *rx_reg_dev;
- spinlock_t bcm_tx_lock; /* protect currframe/count in runtime updates */
+ spinlock_t bcm_tx_lock; /* protect tx data and timer updates */
spinlock_t bcm_rx_update_lock; /* protect filter/timer data updates */
};
@@ -467,12 +467,18 @@ static bool bcm_tx_set_expiry(struct bcm_op *op, struct hrtimer *hrt)
{
ktime_t ival;
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
if (op->kt_ival1 && op->count)
ival = op->kt_ival1;
- else if (op->kt_ival2)
+ else if (op->kt_ival2) {
ival = op->kt_ival2;
- else
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
return false;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
hrtimer_set_expires(hrt, ktime_add(ktime_get(), ival));
return true;
@@ -489,25 +495,47 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart bcm_tx_timeout_handler(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
{
struct bcm_op *op = container_of(hrtimer, struct bcm_op, timer);
struct bcm_msg_head msg_head;
+ bool tx_ival1, tx_ival2;
+
+ /* snapshot kt_ival1/kt_ival2/count under lock to avoid torn
+ * ktime_t reads racing with concurrent bcm_tx_setup() updates
+ */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ tx_ival1 = op->kt_ival1 && (op->count > 0);
+ tx_ival2 = !!op->kt_ival2;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ if (tx_ival1) {
+ u32 flags, count;
+ struct bcm_timeval ival1, ival2;
- if (op->kt_ival1 && (op->count > 0)) {
bcm_can_tx(op, NULL);
- if (!op->count && (op->flags & TX_COUNTEVT)) {
+ /* snapshot variables under lock to avoid torn reads racing
+ * with concurrent bcm_tx_setup() updates
+ */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ flags = op->flags;
+ count = op->count;
+ ival1 = op->ival1;
+ ival2 = op->ival2;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ if (!count && (flags & TX_COUNTEVT)) {
/* create notification to user */
memset(&msg_head, 0, sizeof(msg_head));
msg_head.opcode = TX_EXPIRED;
- msg_head.flags = op->flags;
- msg_head.count = op->count;
- msg_head.ival1 = op->ival1;
- msg_head.ival2 = op->ival2;
+ msg_head.flags = flags;
+ msg_head.count = count;
+ msg_head.ival1 = ival1;
+ msg_head.ival2 = ival2;
msg_head.can_id = op->can_id;
msg_head.nframes = 0;
bcm_send_to_user(op, &msg_head, NULL, 0);
}
- } else if (op->kt_ival2) {
+ } else if (tx_ival2) {
bcm_can_tx(op, NULL);
}
@@ -1031,6 +1059,8 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
/* check the given can_id */
op = bcm_find_op(&bo->tx_ops, msg_head, ifindex);
if (op) {
+ void *new_frames;
+
/* update existing BCM operation */
/*
@@ -1041,11 +1071,23 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
if (msg_head->nframes > op->nframes)
return -E2BIG;
- /* update CAN frames content */
+ /* get new CAN frames content into a staging buffer before
+ * locking: validate and normalize the frames there so that
+ * bcm_can_tx() / bcm_tx_timeout_handler() never observe a
+ * partially updated or unvalidated frame in op->frames
+ */
+ new_frames = kmalloc(msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new_frames)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
for (i = 0; i < msg_head->nframes; i++) {
- cf = op->frames + op->cfsiz * i;
+ cf = new_frames + op->cfsiz * i;
err = memcpy_from_msg((u8 *)cf, msg, op->cfsiz);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ kfree(new_frames);
+ return err;
+ }
if (op->flags & CAN_FD_FRAME) {
if (cf->len > 64)
@@ -1055,36 +1097,38 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
err = -EINVAL;
}
- if (err < 0)
+ if (err < 0) {
+ kfree(new_frames);
return err;
+ }
if (msg_head->flags & TX_CP_CAN_ID) {
/* copy can_id into frame */
cf->can_id = msg_head->can_id;
}
}
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ /* update CAN frames content */
+ memcpy(op->frames, new_frames, msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz);
+
op->flags = msg_head->flags;
- /* only lock for unlikely count/nframes/currframe changes */
if (op->nframes != msg_head->nframes ||
- op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX ||
- op->flags & SETTIMER) {
-
- spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX) {
+ /* potentially update changed nframes */
+ op->nframes = msg_head->nframes;
+ /* restart multiple frame transmission */
+ op->currframe = 0;
+ }
- if (op->nframes != msg_head->nframes ||
- op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX) {
- /* potentially update changed nframes */
- op->nframes = msg_head->nframes;
- /* restart multiple frame transmission */
- op->currframe = 0;
- }
+ if (op->flags & SETTIMER)
+ op->count = msg_head->count;
- if (op->flags & SETTIMER)
- op->count = msg_head->count;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
- }
+ kfree(new_frames);
} else {
/* insert new BCM operation for the given can_id */
@@ -1160,10 +1204,12 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
if (op->flags & SETTIMER) {
/* set timer values */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
op->ival1 = msg_head->ival1;
op->ival2 = msg_head->ival2;
op->kt_ival1 = bcm_timeval_to_ktime(msg_head->ival1);
op->kt_ival2 = bcm_timeval_to_ktime(msg_head->ival2);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
/* disable an active timer due to zero values? */
if (!op->kt_ival1 && !op->kt_ival2)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 15:13 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-24 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y " Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 2/8] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 4/8] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 5/8] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 6/8] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 7/8] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:25 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 8/8] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-26 12:04 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/8] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724102558.17056-3-socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox