From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jwlee2217@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
qw3rtyp0@gmail.com
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec()
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 17:24:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726195203.stable-0004@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ecgqkf54.ffs@fw13>
Thanks for doing these. I have queued the 6.12 one, but I would like to
ask for a v2 of this one before taking 6.6, 6.1 and 5.15.
> @@ -714,7 +781,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_
> * it as an overrun (thanks to bump_cpu_timer above).
> */
> unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
> - goto out;
> + return ret;
> }
[...]
> + if (old)
> + old->it_interval = ns_to_timespec64(old_incr);
> +
[...]
> - out:
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - if (old)
> - old->it_interval = ns_to_timespec64(old_incr);
On these trees that changes user-visible behaviour on the TIMER_RETRY
path. Before the patch the "goto out" fell through the shared out:
label, which filled in old->it_interval; afterwards the early return
skips it and the assignment only runs on the success path.
Upstream that is harmless because bfa408f03fc7 ("posix-timers: Retrieve
interval in common timer_settime() code") moved the interval retrieval
into the common code, but that landed in v6.12 and 6.6, 6.1 and 5.15 do
not have it. Their do_timer_settime() sets old_spec64 = NULL before it
goes back around the retry loop, so a timer_settime() that races timer
expiry now reports old_value.it_interval == {0,0} instead of the
previous interval.
Does it make sense?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 9:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-25 20:06 ` [PATCH 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-26 21:24 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-07-26 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-27 9:10 ` [PATCH V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-27 22:19 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260726195203.stable-0004@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jwlee2217@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=qw3rtyp0@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox