Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel.zahka@gmail.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 2/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 19:22:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803192228.49a49867@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.f39af6152c60@gmail.com>

On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:22:21 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Qihang wrote:
> > tpacket_snd() reads dev->hard_header_len independently for skb
> > allocation and header construction in tpacket_fill_skb(). Concurrent
> > netdevice reconfiguration can therefore make the reserved headroom
> > smaller than the amount later pushed, or make copylen - hard_header_len
> > negative.
> > 
> > Snapshot hard_header_len once before processing ring frames and use it
> > for the frame limit, headroom allocation, copy length, and skb
> > construction. Pass the snapshot to tpacket_fill_skb().
> > 
> > The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and
> > header_ops->create is not addressed here.
> > 
> > Fixes: 69e3c75f4d54 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>

Willem, does the *shiko feedback look like false positives?
Both instances seem to provide different feedback, if I'm reading my own
tea leaves right Claude discarded the Gemini feedback about a panic
as a hallucination..

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730082925.93759-2-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com

https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260730082925.93759-2-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30  8:29 [PATCH net v5 0/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in send paths Qihang
2026-07-30  8:29 ` [PATCH net v5 1/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring " Qihang
2026-07-30  8:29 ` [PATCH net v5 2/2] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path Qihang
2026-07-30  9:22   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04  2:22     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-08-04  3:04       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 23:43         ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-05 13:35           ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04  9:00 ` [PATCH net v6 0/3] net: fix hard_header_len races in packet send paths Qihang
2026-08-04  9:00   ` [PATCH net v6 1/3] net: remove CAP_SYS_RAWIO zero-padding in dev_validate_header Qihang
2026-08-04 12:16     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 23:44       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04  9:32 ` [PATCH net v6 2/3] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in non-ring send paths Qihang
2026-08-04  9:33 ` [PATCH net v6 3/3] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path Qihang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803192228.49a49867@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.zahka@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox