From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: zihanx@nebusec.ai,pabeni@redhat.com,vega@nebusec.ai
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] packet: synchronize pressure clearing with ring" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:29:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026081734-marrow-captive-bde1@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 1a35da325cac4d5bcad76a2aa943408a6f1d9000
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026081734-marrow-captive-bde1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 1a35da325cac4d5bcad76a2aa943408a6f1d9000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 09:16:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] packet: synchronize pressure clearing with ring
reconfiguration
packet_set_ring() updates the RX ring state under sk_receive_queue.lock,
but used to publish the tpacket receive mode through po->prot_hook.func
after releasing that lock. packet_poll() and packet_recvmsg() can then
run the pressure clearing path after the ring has been cleared while
still seeing tpacket_rcv, causing __packet_rcv_has_room() to dereference
stale or NULL ring storage.
Move the existing receive hook assignment into the same
sk_receive_queue.lock section as the ring state update. Keep the
assignment otherwise unchanged, including on TX ring reconfiguration, to
avoid adding behavior changes that are not required for the fix.
Serialize packet_recvmsg() pressure clearing with the same queue lock
only after PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE has been observed. If the flag is clear
and the socket has moved away from tpacket_rcv, packet_set_ring() has
already detached the socket and waited for synchronize_net(), so no new
packet input can set the flag again.
packet_poll() already holds sk_receive_queue.lock, so it uses the new
unlocked helper directly.
Fixes: 2ccdbaa6d55b ("packet: rollover lock contention avoidance")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.4
Signed-off-by: Zihan Xi <zihanx@nebusec.ai>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f90b5688311fa278d1361ea8c6be0bf25967d591.1785247446.git.zihanx@nebusec.ai
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 5ae0511e89e3..0e1355be89f6 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1315,13 +1315,25 @@ static int packet_rcv_has_room(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb)
return ret;
}
-static void packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
+static void __packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
{
if (packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE) &&
__packet_rcv_has_room(po, NULL) == ROOM_NORMAL)
packet_sock_flag_set(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE, false);
}
+static void packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(struct packet_sock *po)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = &po->sk;
+
+ if (!packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_PRESSURE))
+ return;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+ __packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+}
+
static void packet_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
@@ -4305,7 +4317,7 @@ static __poll_t packet_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
TP_STATUS_KERNEL))
mask |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
}
- packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
+ __packet_rcv_try_clear_pressure(po);
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_write_queue.lock);
if (po->tx_ring.pg_vec) {
@@ -4545,14 +4557,14 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
rb->frame_max = (req->tp_frame_nr - 1);
rb->head = 0;
rb->frame_size = req->tp_frame_size;
+ po->prot_hook.func = (po->rx_ring.pg_vec) ?
+ tpacket_rcv : packet_rcv;
spin_unlock_bh(&rb_queue->lock);
swap(rb->pg_vec_order, order);
swap(rb->pg_vec_len, req->tp_block_nr);
rb->pg_vec_pages = req->tp_block_size/PAGE_SIZE;
- po->prot_hook.func = (po->rx_ring.pg_vec) ?
- tpacket_rcv : packet_rcv;
skb_queue_purge(rb_queue);
if (atomic_long_read(&po->mapped))
pr_err("packet_mmap: vma is busy: %ld\n",
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 11:29 gregkh [this message]
2026-08-21 14:49 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] net/packet: convert po->pressure to an atomic flag Sasha Levin
2026-08-21 14:49 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] packet: synchronize pressure clearing with ring reconfiguration Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026081734-marrow-captive-bde1@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=zihanx@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox