Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 4/4] net/sched: act_ct: fix sk_buff leak when the header checks reject a packet
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:08:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819190836.561493-4-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819190836.561493-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 8a7ed561671aa6a911a2de99e59ef670a4d0b1df ]

tcf_ct_handle_fragments() runs its header sanity checks before handing
anything to the defragmentation engine:

	if (family == NFPROTO_IPV4)
		err = tcf_ct_ipv4_is_fragment(skb, &frag);
	else
		err = tcf_ct_ipv6_is_fragment(skb, &frag);
	if (err || !frag)
		return err;

tcf_ct_ipv4_is_fragment() returns -EINVAL or -ENOMEM;
tcf_ct_ipv6_is_fragment() adds -EPROTO when ipv6_find_hdr() fails. None of
them frees or queues the skb, so on that path the caller still owns it.

tcf_ct_act() however funnels every non-zero return into the
ownership-transfer exit:

	err = tcf_ct_handle_fragments(net, skb, family, p->zone, &defrag);
	if (err)
		goto out_frag;
	...
out_frag:
	if (err != -EINPROGRESS)
		tcf_action_inc_drop_qstats(&c->common);
	return TC_ACT_CONSUMED;

TC_ACT_CONSUMED means the action took ownership of the skb, so no caller
frees it - sch_handle_ingress(), sch_handle_egress() and
tcf_qevent_handle() all deliberately skip the free for that verdict. The
skb is therefore orphaned: one sk_buff plus its data buffer is leaked per
malformed packet, unbounded. Note the drop counter is already incremented
for these errors, so the statistics claim a drop that never happens.

Three different ownership states reach out_frag: today - the skb may be
queued by the defrag engine (-EINPROGRESS), already freed by
nf_ct_handle_fragments(), or still owned by us. Tell the caller which of
those it is, and free the packet ourselves in the last case, which
restores the TC_ACT_SHOT behaviour that predated the Fixes: commit.

Reproduced on v7.2-rc6 with a 54-byte frame carrying a 40-byte IPv6
header with nexthdr = 0 (hop-by-hop) and nothing after it, on a
clsact ingress chain with "action ct". kmemleak reports one leaked
232-byte skbuff_head_cache object plus its 704-byte data buffer per
packet; with this patch it reports none.

Fixes: 3f14b377d01d ("net/sched: act_ct: fix skb leak and crash on ooo frags")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260806101235.809370-1-hj351016@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ Dropped upstream's `bool add_helper = false;` context line, absent on 6.1, keeping only the new `bool skb_is_ours = false;` declaration. ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/sched/act_ct.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index 81c023f8433cc..f6b2f693e21d5 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -854,8 +854,15 @@ static int tcf_ct_ipv6_is_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, bool *frag)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* On error, tells the caller whether it still owns @skb and must free it
+ * itself.  @skb is ours only when the header checks below reject the packet
+ * before it is handed to the defragmentation engine; once nf_ct_handle_
+ * fragments() has been called the skb is either queued (-EINPROGRESS) or has
+ * already been freed by it.
+ */
 static int tcf_ct_handle_fragments(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
-				   u8 family, u16 zone, bool *defrag)
+				   u8 family, u16 zone, bool *defrag,
+				   bool *skb_is_ours)
 {
 	enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
 	struct nf_conn *ct;
@@ -872,8 +879,12 @@ static int tcf_ct_handle_fragments(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		err = tcf_ct_ipv4_is_fragment(skb, &frag);
 	else
 		err = tcf_ct_ipv6_is_fragment(skb, &frag);
-	if (err || !frag)
+	if (err) {
+		*skb_is_ours = true;
 		return err;
+	}
+	if (!frag)
+		return 0;
 
 	mru = tc_skb_cb(skb)->mru;
 
@@ -1124,6 +1135,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 	struct nf_hook_state state;
 	int nh_ofs, err, retval;
 	struct tcf_ct_params *p;
+	bool skb_is_ours = false;
 	bool skip_add = false;
 	bool defrag = false;
 	struct nf_conn *ct;
@@ -1160,9 +1172,18 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
 	 */
 	nh_ofs = skb_network_offset(skb);
 	skb_pull_rcsum(skb, nh_ofs);
-	err = tcf_ct_handle_fragments(net, skb, family, p->zone, &defrag);
-	if (err)
+	err = tcf_ct_handle_fragments(net, skb, family, p->zone, &defrag,
+				      &skb_is_ours);
+	if (err) {
+		/* The skb is still ours only when the header checks rejected
+		 * it; returning TC_ACT_CONSUMED for such a packet would leak
+		 * it, since no caller frees an skb it was told it no longer
+		 * owns.
+		 */
+		if (skb_is_ours)
+			goto drop;
 		goto out_frag;
+	}
 
 	err = tcf_ct_skb_network_trim(skb, family);
 	if (err)
-- 
2.53.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17 12:43 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: fix sk_buff leak when the header checks" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-08-19 19:08 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/4] openvswitch: use skb_ip_totlen in conntrack Sasha Levin
2026-08-19 19:08   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/4] net: sched: use skb_ip_totlen and iph_totlen Sasha Levin
2026-08-19 19:08   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/4] openvswitch: move key and ovs_cb update out of handle_fragments Sasha Levin
2026-08-19 19:08   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260819190836.561493-4-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hj351016@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox