[PATCH 6.1 20/79] packet: use consistent hard_header_len in TX_RING send path

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Qihang Tang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 21b5953e7494c16a42e6cd8cf110e18d13ae4a6b ]

tpacket_snd() reads dev->hard_header_len independently for skb
allocation and header construction in tpacket_fill_skb(). Concurrent
netdevice reconfiguration can therefore make the reserved headroom
smaller than the amount later pushed, or make copylen - hard_header_len
negative.

Snapshot hard_header_len once before processing ring frames and use it
for the frame limit, headroom allocation, copy length, and skb
construction. Pass the snapshot to tpacket_fill_skb().

The separate SOCK_DGRAM consistency problem between hard_header_len and
header_ops->create is not addressed here.

Fixes: 69e3c75f4d54 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qihang Tang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260805125729.19220-4-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/packet/af_packet.c |   19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -2624,6 +2624,7 @@ static int packet_snd_vnet_parse(struct
 static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		void *frame, struct net_device *dev, void *data, int tp_len,
 		__be16 proto, unsigned char *addr, int hlen, int copylen,
+		int hard_header_len,
 		const struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
 {
 	union tpacket_uhdr ph;
@@ -2655,8 +2656,8 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packe
 	} else if (copylen) {
 		int hdrlen = min_t(int, copylen, tp_len);
 
-		skb_push(skb, dev->hard_header_len);
-		skb_put(skb, copylen - dev->hard_header_len);
+		skb_push(skb, hard_header_len);
+		skb_put(skb, copylen - hard_header_len);
 		err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, data, hdrlen);
 		if (unlikely(err))
 			return err;
@@ -2789,7 +2790,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
 	void *data;
 	int len_sum = 0;
 	int status = TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE;
-	int hlen, tlen, copylen = 0;
+	int hard_header_len, hlen, tlen, copylen = 0;
 	long timeo;
 
 	mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
@@ -2836,8 +2837,9 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
 			goto out_put;
 	}
 
+	hard_header_len = READ_ONCE(dev->hard_header_len);
 	if (po->sk.sk_socket->type == SOCK_RAW)
-		reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
+		reserve = hard_header_len;
 	size_max = po->tx_ring.frame_size
 		- (po->tp_hdrlen - sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll));
 
@@ -2875,7 +2877,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
 			goto tpacket_error;
 
 		status = TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST;
-		hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev);
+		hlen = LL_RESERVED_SPACE_EX(dev, hard_header_len);
 		tlen = dev->needed_tailroom;
 		if (packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_HAS_VNET_HDR)) {
 			data += sizeof(vnet_hdr);
@@ -2893,10 +2895,10 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
 						    vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
 			has_vnet_hdr = true;
 		}
-		copylen = max_t(int, copylen, dev->hard_header_len);
+		copylen = max_t(int, copylen, hard_header_len);
 		skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&po->sk,
 				hlen + tlen + sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll) +
-				(copylen - dev->hard_header_len),
+				(copylen - hard_header_len),
 				!need_wait, &err);
 
 		if (unlikely(skb == NULL)) {
@@ -2906,7 +2908,8 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
 			goto out_status;
 		}
 		tp_len = tpacket_fill_skb(po, skb, ph, dev, data, tp_len, proto,
-					  addr, hlen, copylen, &sockc);
+					  addr, hlen, copylen, hard_header_len,
+					  &sockc);
 		if (likely(tp_len >= 0) &&
 		    tp_len > dev->mtu + reserve &&
 		    !packet_sock_flag(po, PACKET_SOCK_HAS_VNET_HDR) &&