From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.18.y 2/4] ACPI: x86/rtc-cmos: Use platform device for driver binding
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 08:20:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908122004.2049483-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908122004.2049483-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 2a78e42104444f948698f1225deaf515e9b7224d ]
Modify the rtc-cmos driver to bind to a platform device on systems with
ACPI via acpi_match_table and advertise the CMOST RTC ACPI device IDs
for driver auto-loading. Note that adding the requisite device IDs to
it and exposing them via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is sufficient for this
purpose.
Since the ACPI device IDs in question are the same as for the CMOS RTC
ACPI scan handler, put them into a common header file and use the
definition from there in both places.
Additionally, to prevent a PNP device from being created for the CMOS
RTC if a platform one is present already, make is_cmos_rtc_device()
check cmos_rtc_platform_device_present introduced previously.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/13969123.uLZWGnKmhe@rafael.j.wysocki
Stable-dep-of: a3df8bbe0a70 ("ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c | 5 +----
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
index 4ad88187dc7a0..7eb9561b95893 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int is_cmos_rtc_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
{ "PNP0B02" },
{""},
};
- return !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, ids);
+ return !cmos_rtc_platform_device_present && !acpi_match_device_ids(adev, ids);
}
bool acpi_is_pnp_device(struct acpi_device *adev)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
index bdd66dfd4a441..a6df5b991c960 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/cmos_rtc.c
@@ -18,10 +18,7 @@
#include "../internal.h"
static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_cmos_rtc_ids[] = {
- { "PNP0B00" },
- { "PNP0B01" },
- { "PNP0B02" },
- {}
+ ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS
};
bool cmos_rtc_platform_device_present;
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index f8068c717fb85..7ac39c435f630 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -1482,6 +1483,14 @@ static __init void cmos_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
#else
static inline void cmos_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) {}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_cmos_rtc_ids[] = {
+ ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, acpi_cmos_rtc_ids);
+#endif
+
/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* Platform setup should have set up an RTC device, when PNP is
@@ -1536,6 +1545,7 @@ static struct platform_driver cmos_platform_driver = {
.name = driver_name,
.pm = &cmos_pm_ops,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_cmos_match),
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(acpi_cmos_rtc_ids),
}
};
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 7d3a48f6425be..165ed21de842a 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -779,6 +779,12 @@ const char *acpi_get_subsystem_id(acpi_handle handle);
int acpi_mrrm_max_mem_region(void);
#endif
+#define ACPI_CMOS_RTC_IDS \
+ { "PNP0B00", }, \
+ { "PNP0B01", }, \
+ { "PNP0B02", }, \
+ { "", }
+
extern bool cmos_rtc_platform_device_present;
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 13:44 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 1/4] ACPI: x86: cmos_rtc: Create a CMOS RTC platform device Sasha Levin
2026-09-08 12:20 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 3/4] ACPI: TAD: Rearrange RT data validation checking Sasha Levin
2026-09-08 12:20 ` [PATCH 6.18.y 4/4] ACPI: TAD: Add locking around AML evaluations Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908122004.2049483-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox