Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y 6/6] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadloop in f2fs_fsync_node_pages()
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 07:17:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912111706.2282608-6-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912111706.2282608-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ce366bfa821ec81dd45bde547ee31e659306cc61 ]

There is potential deadloop in race condition:

Thread A				Thread B
- fsync
 - f2fs_do_sync_file
  - f2fs_fsync_node_pages
   - last_fsync_dnode
    - folio_get(last_folio)
					- f2fs_setattr
					 - f2fs_truncate
					  - f2fs_truncate_blocks
					   - f2fs_do_truncate_blocks
					    - f2fs_truncate_inode_blocks
					     - truncate_dnode
					      - truncate_node
					       - invalidate_mapping_pages
					        - folio->mapping = NULL
   - is_node_folio alwasy return false
   - atomic && !marked is always true,
     then goto retry

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 608514deba38 ("f2fs: set fsync mark only for the last dnode")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 48064c9c8d8c7..3fa81132f18f9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1916,6 +1916,11 @@ int f2fs_fsync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
 		f2fs_debug(sbi, "Retry to write fsync mark: ino=%u, idx=%lx",
 			   ino, last_folio->index);
 		folio_lock(last_folio);
+		if (unlikely(!is_node_folio(last_folio))) {
+			f2fs_folio_put(last_folio, true);
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
+			goto out;
+		}
 		f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(last_folio, NODE, true, true);
 		folio_mark_dirty(last_folio);
 		folio_unlock(last_folio);
-- 
2.53.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-12 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 11:26 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadloop in" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-12 11:17 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/6] f2fs: Add f2fs_new_node_folio() Sasha Levin
2026-09-12 11:17   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/6] f2fs: Add f2fs_get_node_folio() Sasha Levin
2026-09-12 11:17   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/6] f2fs: Use a folio in truncate_nodes() Sasha Levin
2026-09-12 11:17   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 4/6] f2fs: Use folios in truncate_partial_nodes() Sasha Levin
2026-09-12 11:17   ` [PATCH 6.6.y 5/6] f2fs: introduce is_{meta,node}_folio Sasha Levin
2026-09-12 11:17   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260912111706.2282608-6-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox