Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:22:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026091754-violation-overpass-c61d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903183242.1464421-1-sashal@kernel.org>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 02:32:41PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 5d10d4e19e6daa487f0cd0ea6cba472325de92f9 ]
> 
> Patch series "mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task", v3.
> 
> kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no
> reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with
> very many threads.
> 
> That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host
> configuration:
> 
>       watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
>        scan_block
>        kmemleak_scan
>        kmemleak_scan_thread
>        kthread
> 
> Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between
> tasks
> 
> Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted.
> 
> This patch (of 3):
> 
> kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a
> single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many
> threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog
> a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:
> 
>   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
>    scan_block
>    kmemleak_scan
>    kmemleak_scan_thread
>    kthread
> 
> A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU
> read-side critical section.
> 
> Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read
> lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no
> lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops early
> on scan_should_stop().  This follows the next_tgid()/task_seq_get_next()
> iteration pattern and keeps each RCU critical section short.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260615-kmemleak-stack-resched-v3-0-acecd7d7fd92@debian.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260615-kmemleak-stack-resched-v3-1-acecd7d7fd92@debian.org
> Fixes: c4b28963fd79 ("mm/kmemleak: rely on rcu for task stack scanning")
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Stable-dep-of: 3541a2b06ecd ("mm/kmemleak: report RCU-tasks quiescent states during the scan")
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/kmemleak.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 4092f38d3fc84..0dcdddb3c33d8 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -1499,22 +1499,25 @@ static int scan_should_stop(void)
>  
>  /*
>   * Scan a memory block (exclusive range) for valid pointers and add those
> - * found to the gray list.
> + * found to the gray list. Return non-zero if the scan was interrupted.
>   */
> -static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
> -		       struct kmemleak_object *scanned)
> +static int scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
> +		      struct kmemleak_object *scanned)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *ptr;
>  	unsigned long *start = PTR_ALIGN(_start, BYTES_PER_POINTER);
>  	unsigned long *end = _end - (BYTES_PER_POINTER - 1);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	int stop = 0;
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
>  	for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {
>  		unsigned long pointer;
>  
> -		if (scan_should_stop())
> +		if (scan_should_stop()) {
> +			stop = 1;
>  			break;
> +		}
>  
>  		kasan_disable_current();
>  		pointer = *(unsigned long *)kasan_reset_tag((void *)ptr);
> @@ -1524,22 +1527,28 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
>  		pointer_update_refs(scanned, pointer, OBJECT_PERCPU);
>  	}
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return stop;
>  }
>  
>  /*
>   * Scan a large memory block in MAX_SCAN_SIZE chunks to reduce the latency.
> + * Return non-zero if the scan was interrupted.
>   */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -static void scan_large_block(void *start, void *end)
> +static int scan_large_block(void *start, void *end)
>  {
>  	void *next;
>  
>  	while (start < end) {
>  		next = min(start + MAX_SCAN_SIZE, end);
> -		scan_block(start, next, NULL);
> +		if (scan_block(start, next, NULL))
> +			return 1;
>  		start = next;
>  		cond_resched();
>  	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -1670,6 +1679,43 @@ static void kmemleak_cond_resched(struct kmemleak_object *object)
>  	put_object(object);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Scan all task kernel stacks, rescheduling between tasks. Each task is looked
> + * up and pinned within its own RCU read-side section, so no lock is held across
> + * the scan and the walk cannot trip the soft lockup watchdog.
> + */
> +static void kmemleak_scan_task_stacks(void)
> +{
> +	struct pid *pid;
> +	int nr = 1;
> +	int stop = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		struct task_struct *p = NULL;
> +
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		pid = find_ge_pid(nr, &init_pid_ns);
> +		if (pid) {
> +			nr = pid_nr(pid) + 1;
> +			p = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +			if (p)
> +				get_task_struct(p);
> +		}
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +		if (p) {
> +			void *stack = try_get_task_stack(p);
> +
> +			if (stack) {
> +				stop = scan_block(stack, stack + THREAD_SIZE, NULL);
> +				put_task_stack(p);
> +			}
> +			put_task_struct(p);
> +		}
> +		cond_resched();
> +	} while (pid && !stop);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Scan data sections and all the referenced memory blocks allocated via the
>   * kernel's standard allocators. This function must be called with the
> @@ -1681,6 +1727,7 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
>  	struct zone *zone;
>  	int __maybe_unused i;
>  	int new_leaks = 0;
> +	int stop = 0;
>  
>  	jiffies_last_scan = jiffies;
>  
> @@ -1724,9 +1771,11 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	/* per-cpu sections scanning */
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> -		scan_large_block(__per_cpu_start + per_cpu_offset(i),
> -				 __per_cpu_end + per_cpu_offset(i));
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		if (scan_large_block(__per_cpu_start + per_cpu_offset(i),
> +				     __per_cpu_end + per_cpu_offset(i)))
> +			goto scan_gray;
> +	}
>  #endif
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1753,32 +1802,28 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
>  			/* only scan if page is in use */
>  			if (page_count(page) == 0)
>  				continue;
> -			scan_block(page, page + 1, NULL);
> +			stop = scan_block(page, page + 1, NULL);
> +			if (stop)
> +				break;
>  		}
> +		if (stop)
> +			break;
>  	}
>  	put_online_mems();
> +	if (stop)
> +		goto scan_gray;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Scanning the task stacks (may introduce false negatives).
>  	 */
> -	if (kmemleak_stack_scan) {
> -		struct task_struct *p, *g;
> -
> -		rcu_read_lock();
> -		for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> -			void *stack = try_get_task_stack(p);
> -			if (stack) {
> -				scan_block(stack, stack + THREAD_SIZE, NULL);
> -				put_task_stack(p);
> -			}
> -		}
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> -	}
> +	if (kmemleak_stack_scan)
> +		kmemleak_scan_task_stacks();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Scan the objects already referenced from the sections scanned
>  	 * above.
>  	 */
> +scan_gray:
>  	scan_gray_list();
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 
> 

Does not apply

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 10:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/kmemleak: report RCU-tasks quiescent states during the" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/2] mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks Sasha Levin
2026-09-03 18:32   ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/2] mm/kmemleak: report RCU-tasks quiescent states during the scan Sasha Levin
2026-09-17 11:22   ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026091754-violation-overpass-c61d@gregkh \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox