From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tj@kernel.org,arighi@nvidia.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:43:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026092920-protector-confused-2f3e@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 7de9a6fb44eae4f05e68c805d58b9c618815adfa
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026092920-protector-confused-2f3e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7de9a6fb44eae4f05e68c805d58b9c618815adfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:34:44 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing
a task
ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics") moved the final
ops_state store in scx_dispatch_enqueue() after the DSQ unlock so that the
custody update and ops.dequeue() precede it. A task can thus be found on a
DSQ while still SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING.
The dequeue and core-sched pick paths wait for the state to clear in
ops_dequeue() but the reenqueue paths don't. A reenqueue in that window runs
ops.enqueue() and sets SCX_OPSS_QUEUED before the dispatch has completed.
The dispatcher's final store then overwrites it with SCX_OPSS_NONE and
finish_dispatch() drops every later dispatch of the task.
Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING to clear before dequeueing a task for
reenqueue, the same way ops_dequeue() does.
Fixes: ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 70b711c4de6e..725b890fcab9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -4404,6 +4404,17 @@ static bool local_task_should_reenq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
return *reenq_flags & SCX_REENQ_ANY;
}
+/*
+ * The dispatcher stores the final ops_state after dropping the DSQ lock, so @p
+ * can be found on a DSQ while still %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. Reenqueueing @p
+ * before that store lands would have it clobber the new %SCX_OPSS_QUEUED.
+ */
+void scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (unlikely(atomic_long_read_acquire(&p->scx.ops_state) == SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING))
+ wait_ops_state(p, SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING);
+}
+
static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags)
{
LIST_HEAD(tasks);
@@ -4447,6 +4458,7 @@ static u32 reenq_local(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq, u64 reenq_flags)
if (!local_task_should_reenq(rq, p, &reenq_flags, &reason))
continue;
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
scx_dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK))
@@ -4570,6 +4582,7 @@ static void reenq_user(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, u64 reenq_flag
}
/* @p is on @dsq, its rq and @dsq are locked */
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
dispatch_dequeue_locked(p, dsq);
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
index 3464e0f113c1..115c96fbf932 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
@@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags);
u64 __scx_bpf_now(struct rq *rq);
void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
u64 reenq_flags, struct rq *locked_rq);
+void scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(struct task_struct *p);
int __scx_init_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
struct cgroup *cgrp, bool fork);
void scx_enable_task(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
index f7aeb1488566..a30c965b175d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/sub.c
@@ -801,6 +801,7 @@ void scx_reenq_reject(struct rq *rq)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->migration_pending))
continue;
+ scx_reenq_wait_dispatching(p);
scx_dispatch_dequeue(rq, p);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.flags & SCX_TASK_REENQ_REASON_MASK))
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 11:43 gregkh [this message]
2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 1/2] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs Sasha Levin
2026-09-30 15:09 ` [PATCH 7.2.y 2/2] sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026092920-protector-confused-2f3e@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox