From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jpiecuch@google.com,arighi@nvidia.com,tj@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched_ext: Call ops.dequeue() when a task arrives on a remote" failed to apply to 7.2-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:25:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026101233-atlantic-thwarting-31cc@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 7.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-7.2.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x af701b8d3238b9eb7cd450b0491300452c700bf5
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026101233-atlantic-thwarting-31cc@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 7.2.y' 'HEAD^..'
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From af701b8d3238b9eb7cd450b0491300452c700bf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:23:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] sched_ext: Call ops.dequeue() when a task arrives on a remote
local DSQ
When a task in the BPF scheduler's custody is moved to another CPU's
local DSQ, ops.dequeue() is only called once the task is picked for
execution, from set_next_task_scx() with SCX_DEQ_CORE_SCHED_EXEC, even
though no core-sched pick took place. It should instead be called
without flags when the task is inserted into the destination DSQ, as it
is for same-rq dispatches.
move_remote_task_to_local_dsq() sets p->scx.sticky_cpu across the
migration so that deactivate_task() on the source rq doesn't end custody.
Since commit b75aaea24c9f ("sched_ext: Properly mark SCX-internal
migrations via sticky_cpu"), enqueue_task_scx() only clears it after
inserting the task, so task_leave_custody() still sees the migration in
progress and skips the custody exit.
Clear p->scx.sticky_cpu as soon as enqueue_task_scx() has read it, as
was done before that commit. The source side is unaffected.
Fixes: ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 7.1.x: 18d62044cda7: sched_ext: Preserve rq tracking across local DSQ dispatch
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 7.1.x
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5.5
Signed-off-by: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 493b7aac7087..5209510d6a5e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -2152,6 +2152,13 @@ static void enqueue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int core_enq_
int sticky_cpu = p->scx.sticky_cpu;
u64 enq_flags = core_enq_flags | rq->scx.remote_activate_enq_flags;
+ /*
+ * An SCX-internal migration ends on arrival. Clear sticky_cpu so @p can
+ * leave custody when inserted into the destination DSQ.
+ */
+ if (sticky_cpu >= 0)
+ p->scx.sticky_cpu = -1;
+
/*
* SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP promises a task_woken_scx() call once this enqueue
* returns. Only the core's wakeup path delivers one. The flags stashed
@@ -2190,9 +2197,6 @@ static void enqueue_task_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int core_enq_
dl_server_start(&rq->ext_server);
scx_do_enqueue_task(rq, p, enq_flags, sticky_cpu);
-
- if (sticky_cpu >= 0)
- p->scx.sticky_cpu = -1;
out:
rq->scx.flags &= ~SCX_RQ_IN_WAKEUP;
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 15:25 gregkh [this message]
2026-10-13 9:02 ` [PATCH 7.2.y] sched_ext: Call ops.dequeue() when a task arrives on a remote local DSQ Kuba Piecuch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026101233-atlantic-thwarting-31cc@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=jpiecuch@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox