From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)"
<cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>,
AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] io_uring/cancel: don't spin on local work the task can't run
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:53:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261022145316.1675229-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026102128-glutton-blaming-7e9e@gregkh>
From: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs)" <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
[ Upstream commit fddcf4c5321b3ea5f72166c3fd36a9d1c34f80c7 ]
io_uring_cancel_generic() refuses to sleep while any ring on the exiting
task's tctx has local work pending. It assumes the task is that ring's
submitter and that the next io_uring_try_cancel_requests() pass will run
the work. This does not hold for a ring that was still
IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED when the task got its tctx node from
io_uring_create() or io_ringfd_register(). The submitter is set later by
IORING_REGISTER_ENABLE_RINGS, possibly from another task, and only the
submitter may run local work on an IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN ring. To
the exiting task the work stays pending forever, the loop never reaches
schedule(), and the task trips the WARN_ON_ONCE() once and then spins in
do_exit().
An unprivileged user can set this up at will by creating a disabled
ring, having a child enable it and stop, posting to the ring with
IORING_OP_MSG_RING and exiting with a request in flight that only the
child can complete. The exiting thread burns a CPU until the child runs
or dies, and with panic_on_warn set the WARN panics the kernel.
Fix by skipping the sleep only when io_allowed_defer_tw_run() allows the
task to run the work. This is reasonable since work it cannot run cannot
complete any of its requests either, so nothing is lost by sleeping.
Drop the WARN_ON_ONCE() since handing a disabled ring to another thread
is a supported scenario, not a bug state.
Fixes: 360cd42c4e95 ("io_uring: optimise io_req_local_work_add")
Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft Security FORGE Labs) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261008191602.45101-1-cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[ sashal: replaced io_local_work_pending() with a direct !llist_empty() check on work_llist ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index d4973d0d4e434..e74f49546961f 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -3491,12 +3491,11 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
prepare_to_wait(&tctx->wait, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
io_run_task_work();
io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
+ /* only skip the sleep for local work this task may run */
xa_for_each(&tctx->xa, index, node) {
- if (!llist_empty(&node->ctx->work_llist)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(node->ctx->submitter_task &&
- node->ctx->submitter_task != current);
+ if (!llist_empty(&node->ctx->work_llist) &&
+ io_allowed_defer_tw_run(node->ctx))
goto end_wait;
- }
}
/*
* If we've seen completions, retry without waiting. This
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 15:10 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/cancel: don't spin on local work the task can't run" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-10-22 14:53 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261022145316.1675229-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox