From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 2/3] smb: client: fix warning in CIFSFindNext()
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 14:36:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104155725.3917936-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104155725.3917936-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
[ Upstream commit 215533f888dcf18f7cfbbf520bdd52e67ac6265a ]
This fixes the following warning reported by kernel test robot
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:4216 CIFSFindNext() warn: missing error
code? 'rc'
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202306170124.CtQqzf0I-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Stable-dep-of: 59131dd72f62 ("smb: client: fix use-after-free infoleak via the readdir resume name")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c b/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
index 735d01f5e992c..0c06b79f540b2 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
@@ -4055,11 +4055,12 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
TRANSACTION2_FNEXT_REQ *pSMB = NULL;
TRANSACTION2_FNEXT_RSP *pSMBr = NULL;
T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *parms;
- char *response_data;
- int rc = 0;
- int bytes_returned;
unsigned int name_len;
+ unsigned int lnoff;
__u16 params, byte_count;
+ char *response_data;
+ int bytes_returned;
+ int rc = 0;
cifs_dbg(FYI, "In FindNext\n");
@@ -4104,8 +4105,8 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
pSMB->ResumeFileName[name_len] = 0;
pSMB->ResumeFileName[name_len+1] = 0;
} else {
- rc = -EINVAL;
- goto FNext2_err_exit;
+ cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
byte_count = params + 1 /* pad */ ;
pSMB->TotalParameterCount = cpu_to_le16(params);
@@ -4116,71 +4117,61 @@ int CIFSFindNext(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
rc = SendReceive(xid, tcon->ses, (struct smb_hdr *) pSMB,
(struct smb_hdr *) pSMBr, &bytes_returned, 0);
cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->stats.cifs_stats.num_fnext);
+
if (rc) {
+ cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
if (rc == -EBADF) {
psrch_inf->endOfSearch = true;
- cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
rc = 0; /* search probably was closed at end of search*/
- } else
+ } else {
cifs_dbg(FYI, "FindNext returned = %d\n", rc);
- } else { /* decode response */
- rc = validate_t2((struct smb_t2_rsp *)pSMBr);
-
- if (rc == 0) {
- unsigned int lnoff;
-
- /* BB fixme add lock for file (srch_info) struct here */
- if (pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_UNICODE)
- psrch_inf->unicode = true;
- else
- psrch_inf->unicode = false;
- response_data = (char *) &pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
- le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.ParameterOffset);
- parms = (T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *)response_data;
- response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
- le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.DataOffset);
- if (psrch_inf->smallBuf)
- cifs_small_buf_release(
- psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
- else
- cifs_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
- psrch_inf->srch_entries_start = response_data;
- psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start = (char *)pSMB;
- psrch_inf->smallBuf = false;
- if (parms->EndofSearch)
- psrch_inf->endOfSearch = true;
- else
- psrch_inf->endOfSearch = false;
- psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer =
- le16_to_cpu(parms->SearchCount);
- psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry +=
- psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer;
- lnoff = le16_to_cpu(parms->LastNameOffset);
- if (CIFSMaxBufSize < lnoff) {
- cifs_dbg(VFS, "ignoring corrupt resume name\n");
- psrch_inf->last_entry = NULL;
- return rc;
- } else
- psrch_inf->last_entry =
- psrch_inf->srch_entries_start + lnoff;
-
-/* cifs_dbg(FYI, "fnxt2 entries in buf %d index_of_last %d\n",
- psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer, psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry); */
-
- /* BB fixme add unlock here */
}
+ return rc;
+ }
+ /* decode response */
+ rc = validate_t2((struct smb_t2_rsp *)pSMBr);
+ if (rc) {
+ cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
+ return rc;
}
+ /* BB fixme add lock for file (srch_info) struct here */
+ psrch_inf->unicode = !!(pSMBr->hdr.Flags2 & SMBFLG2_UNICODE);
+ response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
+ le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.ParameterOffset);
+ parms = (T2_FNEXT_RSP_PARMS *)response_data;
+ response_data = (char *)&pSMBr->hdr.Protocol +
+ le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->t2.DataOffset);
- /* BB On error, should we leave previous search buf (and count and
- last entry fields) intact or free the previous one? */
+ if (psrch_inf->smallBuf)
+ cifs_small_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
+ else
+ cifs_buf_release(psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start);
- /* Note: On -EAGAIN error only caller can retry on handle based calls
- since file handle passed in no longer valid */
-FNext2_err_exit:
- if (rc != 0)
- cifs_buf_release(pSMB);
- return rc;
+ psrch_inf->srch_entries_start = response_data;
+ psrch_inf->ntwrk_buf_start = (char *)pSMB;
+ psrch_inf->smallBuf = false;
+ psrch_inf->endOfSearch = !!parms->EndofSearch;
+ psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer = le16_to_cpu(parms->SearchCount);
+ psrch_inf->index_of_last_entry += psrch_inf->entries_in_buffer;
+ lnoff = le16_to_cpu(parms->LastNameOffset);
+ if (CIFSMaxBufSize < lnoff) {
+ cifs_dbg(VFS, "ignoring corrupt resume name\n");
+ psrch_inf->last_entry = NULL;
+ } else {
+ psrch_inf->last_entry =
+ psrch_inf->srch_entries_start + lnoff;
+ }
+ /* BB fixme add unlock here */
+
+ /*
+ * BB: On error, should we leave previous search buf
+ * (and count and last entry fields) intact or free the previous one?
+ *
+ * Note: On -EAGAIN error only caller can retry on handle based calls
+ * since file handle passed in no longer valid.
+ */
+ return 0;
}
int
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 13:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] smb: client: fix use-after-free infoleak via the readdir" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-11-04 19:36 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/3] smb: client: fix warning in CIFSFindFirst() Sasha Levin
2026-11-04 19:36 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-11-04 19:36 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/3] smb: client: fix use-after-free infoleak via the readdir resume name Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104155725.3917936-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox