Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>,
	 linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	 Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	 Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	 "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	 Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	 "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 06/13] ext4: sync inode metadata in ext4_evict_inode()
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 13:41:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v2-6-48628c60c336@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v2-0-48628c60c336@kernel.org>

Without a journal ext4_mark_iloc_dirty() copies the inode into the inode
table block, marks the block dirty and sets I_METADATA_WRITEBACK so that
a later fsync() writes the block out and waits for it. But the bit goes
away with the inode. If the inode is evicted and read back in, fsync()
finds a clean inode and returns while the block might still be dirty or
under writeback.

Right now that can't happen because inode_lru_isolate() never lets go
of an inode with I_METADATA_WRITEBACK set. That is about to change.

So call ext4_sync_inode_metadata() from ext4_evict_inode() for a linked
inode that still has the bit set. It syncs the metadata buffers as well
so it replaces the mmb_sync() there, and since the previous patch it
doesn't read anything from disk. With a journal the bit is never set
and nothing changes.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.3
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 18362580097f..c64cedd86826 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -261,9 +261,19 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 			ext4_warning_inode(inode, "data will be lost");
 
 		truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
-		mmb = ext4_i_metadata_bhs(inode);
-		if (mmb)
-			mmb_sync(mmb);
+		/*
+		 * fsync() can't find what I_METADATA_WRITEBACK tracks once the
+		 * inode is gone. This syncs the metadata buffers as well.
+		 */
+		if (inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_METADATA_WRITEBACK) {
+			ext4_sync_inode_metadata(inode, &(struct writeback_control) {
+				.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
+			});
+		} else {
+			mmb = ext4_i_metadata_bhs(inode);
+			if (mmb)
+				mmb_sync(mmb);
+		}
 		goto no_delete;
 	}
 

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 12:41 [PATCH RFC v2 00/13] fs: reclaim inodes with I_METADATA_WRITEBACK Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/13] ext2: add ext2_inode_block() helper Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/13] ext2: don't read the inode block in ext2_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/13] ext2: sync inode metadata in ext2_evict_inode() Christian Brauner
2026-11-06 15:50   ` Jan Kara
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/13] ext4: use sb_find_get_block_nonatomic() in ext4_get_inode_loc_noio() Christian Brauner
2026-11-06 15:20   ` Jan Kara
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/13] ext4: don't read the inode block in ext4_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-11-06 15:20   ` Jan Kara
2026-11-05 12:41 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/13] minix: add minix_inode_block() helper Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/13] minix: don't read the inode block in minix_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/13] minix: sync inode metadata in minix_evict_inode() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/13] udf: don't allocate the inode block in udf_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/13] udf: sync inode metadata in udf_evict_inode() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/13] fat: sync inode metadata in fat_evict_inode() Christian Brauner
2026-11-05 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/13] fs: don't strand I_METADATA_WRITEBACK inodes outside the LRU Christian Brauner
2026-11-06 15:22   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261105-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v2-6-48628c60c336@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox