From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y] xfs: allow softlimit with no hardlimit in quota scrub
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:36:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105153535.1859622-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026110443-mobile-krypton-9fb6@gregkh>
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 342c2e00b3a99099a7088f7b8c8f075670c603a9 ]
LOLLM observes that the sysadmin can set a user's soft limit to a
nonzero value and the hard limit to zero, so those aren't corruptions.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15
Fixes: c2fc338c87a31f ("xfs: scrub quota information")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LOLLM # finding obvious bugs
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
[ sashal: omitted the quota repair changes in xrep_quota_item() ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
index e34ca20ae8e40..42cccc6505f76 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/quota.c
@@ -103,21 +103,21 @@ xchk_quota_item(
* suspect, which is why we flag it for review.
*
* Complain about corruption if the soft limit is greater than
- * the hard limit.
+ * the hard limit and there's a hard limit set.
*/
if (dq->q_blk.hardlimit > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
- if (dq->q_blk.softlimit > dq->q_blk.hardlimit)
+ if (dq->q_blk.hardlimit && dq->q_blk.softlimit > dq->q_blk.hardlimit)
xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
if (dq->q_ino.hardlimit > M_IGEO(mp)->maxicount)
xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
- if (dq->q_ino.softlimit > dq->q_ino.hardlimit)
+ if (dq->q_ino.hardlimit && dq->q_ino.softlimit > dq->q_ino.hardlimit)
xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
if (dq->q_rtb.hardlimit > mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks)
xchk_fblock_set_warning(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
- if (dq->q_rtb.softlimit > dq->q_rtb.hardlimit)
+ if (dq->q_rtb.hardlimit && dq->q_rtb.softlimit > dq->q_rtb.hardlimit)
xchk_fblock_set_corrupt(sc, XFS_DATA_FORK, offset);
/* Check the resource counts. */
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 15:15 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: allow softlimit with no hardlimit in quota scrub" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-11-05 15:36 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105153535.1859622-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox