From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y 1/2] nfs: convert to using new filelock helpers
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:58:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106005831.3499434-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026110415-pamphlet-protrude-0e3f@gregkh>
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d7c9616be0759c1cfb44a68ba838548d22b98484 ]
Convert to using the new file locking helper functions. Also, in later
patches we're going to introduce some temporary macros with names that
clash with the variable name in nfs4_proc_unlck. Rename it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131-flsplit-v3-11-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7fa2ad367abe ("NFSv4/flexfiles: fail I/O to the data server once a lock is lost")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfs/delegation.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/file.c | 4 ++--
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 12 ++++++------
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 18 +++++++++---------
fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/write.c | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/delegation.c b/fs/nfs/delegation.c
index af7751f05bbd7..55b345a4b9e48 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/delegation.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/delegation.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int nfs_delegation_claim_locks(struct nfs4_state *state, const nfs4_state
list = &flctx->flc_posix;
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
restart:
- list_for_each_entry(fl, list, fl_list) {
+ for_each_file_lock(fl, list) {
if (nfs_file_open_context(fl->fl_file)->state != state)
continue;
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index cf16ee710d42b..1d67e7c7d6e73 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ int nfs_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
if (IS_GETLK(cmd))
ret = do_getlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
- else if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+ else if (lock_is_unlock(fl))
ret = do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
else
ret = do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ int nfs_flock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
is_local = 1;
/* We're simulating flock() locks using posix locks on the server */
- if (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+ if (lock_is_unlock(fl))
return do_unlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
return do_setlk(filp, cmd, fl, is_local);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 626f7337dd535..cf1832641b84a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -7074,7 +7074,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_unlck(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
struct rpc_task *task;
struct nfs_seqid *(*alloc_seqid)(struct nfs_seqid_counter *, gfp_t);
int status = 0;
- unsigned char fl_flags = request->fl_flags;
+ unsigned char saved_flags = request->fl_flags;
status = nfs4_set_lock_state(state, request);
/* Unlock _before_ we do the RPC call */
@@ -7109,7 +7109,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_unlck(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
status = rpc_wait_for_completion_task(task);
rpc_put_task(task);
out:
- request->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ request->fl_flags = saved_flags;
trace_nfs4_unlock(request, state, F_SETLK, status);
return status;
}
@@ -7427,7 +7427,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
{
struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(state->inode);
struct nfs4_state_owner *sp = state->owner;
- unsigned char fl_flags = request->fl_flags;
+ unsigned char flags = request->fl_flags;
int status;
request->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
@@ -7439,7 +7439,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
if (test_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags)) {
/* Yes: cache locks! */
/* ...but avoid races with delegation recall... */
- request->fl_flags = fl_flags & ~FL_SLEEP;
+ request->fl_flags = flags & ~FL_SLEEP;
status = locks_lock_inode_wait(state->inode, request);
up_read(&nfsi->rwsem);
mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
@@ -7449,7 +7449,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock
mutex_unlock(&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex);
status = _nfs4_do_setlk(state, cmd, request, NFS_LOCK_NEW);
out:
- request->fl_flags = fl_flags;
+ request->fl_flags = flags;
return status;
}
@@ -7591,7 +7591,7 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
if (!(IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (request->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
+ if (lock_is_unlock(request)) {
if (state != NULL)
return nfs4_proc_unlck(state, cmd, request);
return 0;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
index 78d52c2006dcc..7805f33d77a03 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -847,15 +847,15 @@ void nfs4_close_sync(struct nfs4_state *state, fmode_t fmode)
*/
static struct nfs4_lock_state *
__nfs4_find_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state,
- fl_owner_t fl_owner, fl_owner_t fl_owner2)
+ fl_owner_t owner, fl_owner_t owner2)
{
struct nfs4_lock_state *pos, *ret = NULL;
list_for_each_entry(pos, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
- if (pos->ls_owner == fl_owner) {
+ if (pos->ls_owner == owner) {
ret = pos;
break;
}
- if (pos->ls_owner == fl_owner2)
+ if (pos->ls_owner == owner2)
ret = pos;
}
if (ret)
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ __nfs4_find_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state,
* exists, return an uninitialized one.
*
*/
-static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_owner_t fl_owner)
+static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_owner_t owner)
{
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp;
struct nfs_server *server = state->owner->so_server;
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, f
nfs4_init_seqid_counter(&lsp->ls_seqid);
refcount_set(&lsp->ls_count, 1);
lsp->ls_state = state;
- lsp->ls_owner = fl_owner;
+ lsp->ls_owner = owner;
lsp->ls_seqid.owner_id = ida_alloc(&server->lockowner_id, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (lsp->ls_seqid.owner_id < 0)
goto out_free;
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ static int nfs4_copy_lock_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
const struct nfs_lock_context *l_ctx)
{
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp;
- fl_owner_t fl_owner, fl_flock_owner;
+ fl_owner_t owner, fl_flock_owner;
int ret = -ENOENT;
if (l_ctx == NULL)
@@ -1002,11 +1002,11 @@ static int nfs4_copy_lock_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
if (test_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags) == 0)
goto out;
- fl_owner = l_ctx->lockowner;
+ owner = l_ctx->lockowner;
fl_flock_owner = l_ctx->open_context->flock_owner;
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
- lsp = __nfs4_find_lock_state(state, fl_owner, fl_flock_owner);
+ lsp = __nfs4_find_lock_state(state, owner, fl_flock_owner);
if (lsp && test_bit(NFS_LOCK_LOST, &lsp->ls_flags))
ret = -EIO;
else if (lsp != NULL && test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags) != 0) {
@@ -1529,7 +1529,7 @@ static int nfs4_reclaim_locks(struct nfs4_state *state, const struct nfs4_state_
down_write(&nfsi->rwsem);
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
restart:
- list_for_each_entry(fl, list, fl_list) {
+ for_each_file_lock(fl, list) {
if (nfs_file_open_context(fl->fl_file)->state != state)
continue;
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
index a9d57fcdf9b40..b685d6f641900 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static void encode_link(struct xdr_stream *xdr, const struct qstr *name, struct
static inline int nfs4_lock_type(struct file_lock *fl, int block)
{
- if (fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK)
+ if (lock_is_read(fl))
return block ? NFS4_READW_LT : NFS4_READ_LT;
return block ? NFS4_WRITEW_LT : NFS4_WRITE_LT;
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index 85426764017ce..b8c957318396e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ static bool
is_whole_file_wrlock(struct file_lock *fl)
{
return fl->fl_start == 0 && fl->fl_end == OFFSET_MAX &&
- fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK;
+ lock_is_write(fl);
}
/* If we know the page is up to date, and we're not using byte range locks (or
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static int nfs_can_extend_write(struct file *file, struct folio *folio,
} else if (!list_empty(&flctx->flc_flock)) {
fl = list_first_entry(&flctx->flc_flock, struct file_lock,
fl_list);
- if (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK)
+ if (lock_is_write(fl))
ret = 1;
}
spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 18:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] NFSv4/flexfiles: fail I/O to the data server once a lock is" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2026-11-06 0:58 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-11-06 0:58 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/2] NFSv4/flexfiles: fail I/O to the data server once a lock is lost Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106005831.3499434-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox