From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: scardracs@disroot.org, denis.benato@linux.dev, w_armin@gmx.de,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 06:05:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x b9428edaf4109e86a97254228d831767d0acc1f8
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' 'HEAD^..'
Thanks,
Sasha
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b9428edaf4109e86a97254228d831767d0acc1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:14:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with
a mutex
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI management methods (from ACPI notify,
HID, userspace daemons, and debugfs) enter the BIOS ACPI/SMM interface
simultaneously, triggering re-entrant SMIs or EC mailbox buffer corruption.
Fix this at the root by introducing a centralized evaluation helper
(asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked()) protected by a global mutex
(asus_wmi_eval_lock) using guard(mutex). Route all evaluations of
ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID (method3, method5, method_buf, and show_call) through
this helper.
A static mutex is required because asus_wmi_evaluate_method() is an
exported symbol used by external modules (such as hid-asus and
asus-armoury) that lack access to struct asus_wmi drvdata, and the
underlying ASUS ACPI/EC management method is a single physical platform
resource.
The mutex is non-recursive: nested ACPI/WMI notify handlers must not call
back into evaluate on the same task (defer via workqueue, as
asus_rfkill_notify already does).
The sysfs-versus-notify race predates the later export of
asus_wmi_evaluate_method(), so Fixes points at the original shared
evaluate helper rather than that export.
Link: https://github.com/OpenGamingCollective/asusctl/issues/328
Fixes: d33da3b68669 ("asus-wmi: factorise wmi_evaluate_method call")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <scardracs@disroot.org>
Reviewed-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/b6a1981777e63f0c28bd719d8203ebbda57d6957.1789722252.git.scardracs@disroot.org
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index a2e552b207fba..60fbe13e100fe 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/backlight.h>
#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
@@ -28,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/leds.h>
#include <linux/minmax.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h>
@@ -353,6 +355,20 @@ static void asus_wmi_show_deprecated(void)
/* WMI ************************************************************************/
+/*
+ * Concurrent evaluations of ASUS WMI methods can re-enter firmware
+ * SMI/EC mailbox handling and corrupt the mailbox.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(asus_wmi_eval_lock);
+
+static acpi_status asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(u32 method_id,
+ struct acpi_buffer *input,
+ struct acpi_buffer *output)
+{
+ guard(mutex)(&asus_wmi_eval_lock);
+ return wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id, input, output);
+}
+
static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
u32 arg0, u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 *retval)
{
@@ -367,8 +383,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method3(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 tmp = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1, arg2);
@@ -419,8 +434,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method5(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 tmp = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4);
@@ -467,8 +481,7 @@ static int asus_wmi_evaluate_method_buf(u32 method_id,
union acpi_object *obj;
int err = 0;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID, 0, method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(method_id, &input, &output);
pr_debug("%s called (0x%08x) with args: 0x%08x, 0x%08x\n",
__func__, method_id, arg0, arg1);
@@ -5092,9 +5105,8 @@ static int show_call(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
union acpi_object *obj;
acpi_status status;
- status = wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_MGMT_GUID,
- 0, asus->debug.method_id,
- &input, &output);
+ status = asus_wmi_evaluate_method_locked(asus->debug.method_id,
+ &input, &output);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return -EIO;
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 11:05 Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-11-10 16:47 ` [PATCH 5.15.y] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Serialize WMI method evaluations with a mutex Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261107060506-failed-5.15-b9428edaf410@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=denis.benato@linux.dev \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=scardracs@disroot.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w_armin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox