From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794064279; b=0ZbMNpCwTBIwYsEYd5wZslcUsAglcZE8qt49dVvwIXoPYUbT6L0/+kAvQA8Zk2Ps+ZiQ wl7pyRnODPRImNE1i+Qwhvb9LwKOSEXQxQ67z+Iz51M99uQEs0KQ4RCC5HoXd+pydpIxi coMq0gPVh+ituUPbz/br4pDnDh2Cia8vAN5rYtEPLq8YQdpQLVEEiW0GpFguTmaNmWEZb F01Hn4bQPJT6Qslh1YZSkgHlf0YNzKythsLX6y+fU7JHqgQcytxII1EHfivOTgWSg24Jg UWHxTYJo+oew1j8D2N4OO7ZaCsRJNPly4nJFJwLZZZZUemL0mLWJpSzmr3kfa3kIbIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794064279; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:User-Agent:X-stable:X-Patchwork-Hint: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=JoSoGld/HNRJgSMgar+orPwcQ+MO4+ZJBNLpXPPFQjs=; b=QNhYKholzoeqLjS7jjrQWcBGwnnrZ3N1zqTVmd7Pe8Y37jsYnVg+eZvlTLY6hjYmMN83 0Bb3UtmKD+j43ZC89sZQdsNZ1mpEA4kjWF52xhggkwfOcPtFL9GcpdSRcDBDwonm55mPi nKUvle8dW+0BfqpDYibNjT593urdPFRYK6XaRUUhanBmQHVSM7mVInhTqxfVTNIL1oE+l FlcXhecJ6oqnhUmArtdrCU2bYSyGWZH7I7mS9sRB4vUYMaVSfR8Tqn4uTfHtg1OBMS2Rp 1MSaFzPoIyc6+izuqLLCGXWjE6J5gGZr2UZIg1TqISlvmERx2+CZ27tDK6DK5ecIhrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=iFovAtAU; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984586082BE4; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 15:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=iFovAtAU Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44DD91F008A1; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 15:11:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1794064279; bh=JoSoGld/HNRJgSMgar+orPwcQ+MO4+ZJBNLpXPPFQjs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=iFovAtAUSdOAG98Jpe54XP6DmfP9U15ipvv1LUufnft3qDYQruPLafGtZvnuwN/mA BQgMI5kitDTf6/C+U9U6ZKDKX2BTKo73hkXycUWuu4JYybDdy4/Gk04Q8luv1fj8qq 8KeZwgyOwK0qEc8v0GwFR6nPlb3bvwuBZ0bnoo3E= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Hari Bathini , Abhishek Dubey , Saket Kumar Bhaskar , Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula , R Nageswara Sastry , Madhavan Srinivasan , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 7.3 0374/1257] powerpc/bpf: fix buffer overflow in JIT for large BPF programs Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 08:44:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20261107134949.884893055@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.56.0 In-Reply-To: <20261107134939.434104957@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20261107134939.434104957@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 7.3-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Abhishek Dubey [ Upstream commit 78ce55b7913a78e1687306668e078b86bc6508ee ] During size calculation in pass-0, exit_addr is 0 since addrs[fp->len] is not yet populated. bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn() treats a zero exit_addr as in-range and skips bpf_jit_build_epilogue(), so the alternate inline epilogue instructions are not counted in alloclen. In later passes, if the real exit_addr falls outside the 32MB branch range, the full inline epilogue is emitted into the already-allocated buffer, writing past its end and corrupting adjacent memory. Fix by ensuring exit_addr is non-zero before treating it as in-range, so pass-0 always falls through to bpf_jit_build_epilogue() and conservatively accounts for all epilogue instructions in alloclen. Also range check alt_exit_addr directly in the else-if condition. Since exit_addr handling now falls through to the epilogue, two related issues in bpf_int_jit_compile() must also be addressed: 1. Reset cgctx.alt_exit_addr before the second size-calculation pass. Without this, a stale alt_exit_addr from the first pass causes the second pass to emit a single jump instead of the full epilogue, undercounting alloclen and reintroducing the overflow. 2. Recompute addrs[fp->len] at the end of each code-generation pass. The larger pass-0 body can shrink in later passes as out-of-range exits settle into in-range jumps; a stale addrs[fp->len] would leave exit branches targeting past the real (shrunken) epilogue. Because shrinkage in a later pass can move the epilogue offset, the fixed two-pass loop is no longer sufficient: an exit that was out of range in an earlier pass may fall in range once the epilogue offset shrinks, shrinking the body further and overwriting the start of the epilogue. Convert the code-generation loop to iterate until the program size converges, bounded by CODEGEN_MAX_PASSES, and fail the JIT if it does not converge. Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260529015855.364704-2-adubey@linux.ibm.com/T/#mfcb23909d977b949727cca4f59ee56a13fd69b92 Fixes: 0ffdbce6f4a8 ("powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar Tested-by: Yeswanth Krishna Tellakula Tested-by: R Nageswara Sastry Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260529015855.364704-2-adubey@linux.ibm.com/T/#mfcb23909d977b949727cca4f59ee56a13fd69b92 Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan Link: https://patch.msgid.link/eebffa997e07781b384c4480e2b03c5b87c1aeb1.1789982239.git.skb99@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 7 +++++++ arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index f32de8704d4d9..995308654a569 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ #include #include +/* + * We need at least 2 passes for proper code generation, and may need + * additional passes if code size changes between passes. + */ +#define CODEGEN_MIN_PASSES 2 +#define CODEGEN_MAX_PASSES 3 + #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 #define FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE 24 #else diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index ffee1a76e5302..0c277a11b641e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -99,11 +99,10 @@ void bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr) { - if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) { + if (exit_addr && is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (long)(ctx->idx * 4))) { PPC_JMP(exit_addr); - } else if (ctx->alt_exit_addr) { - if (WARN_ON(!is_offset_in_branch_range((long)ctx->alt_exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4)))) - return -1; + } else if (ctx->alt_exit_addr && is_offset_in_branch_range( + (long)(ctx->alt_exit_addr) - (long)(ctx->idx * 4))) { PPC_JMP(ctx->alt_exit_addr); } else { ctx->alt_exit_addr = ctx->idx * 4; @@ -274,6 +273,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr */ if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL || !is_offset_in_branch_range((long)cgctx.idx * 4)) { cgctx.idx = 0; + cgctx.alt_exit_addr = 0; if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) goto out_err; } @@ -306,10 +306,13 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr code_base = (u32 *)(image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE); fcode_base = (u32 *)(fimage + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE); - /* Code generation passes 1-2 */ - for (pass = 1; pass < 3; pass++) { + /* Code generation passes 1-2+, loop until program size converges. */ + for (pass = 1; pass <= CODEGEN_MAX_PASSES; pass++) { + u32 prev_proglen = proglen; + /* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */ cgctx.idx = 0; + cgctx.exentry_idx = 0; cgctx.alt_exit_addr = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, fcode_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass, @@ -318,11 +321,26 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_pr bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(fhdr, hdr); goto out_err; } + addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4; bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, &cgctx); + proglen = cgctx.idx * 4; + if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) pr_info("Pass %d: shrink = %d, seen = 0x%x\n", pass, - proglen - (cgctx.idx * 4), cgctx.seen); + prev_proglen - proglen, cgctx.seen); + + /* Check if program size has converged, but ensure minimum passes */ + if (pass >= CODEGEN_MIN_PASSES && proglen == prev_proglen) + break; + + if (pass == CODEGEN_MAX_PASSES && proglen != prev_proglen) { + pr_err("BPF JIT: Program did not converge after %d passes\n", + CODEGEN_MAX_PASSES); + bpf_arch_text_copy(&fhdr->size, &hdr->size, sizeof(hdr->size)); + bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(fhdr, hdr); + goto out_err; + } } if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) @@ -399,7 +417,7 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass u32 *fixup; /* Populate extable entries only in the last pass */ - if (pass != 2) + if (pass < CODEGEN_MIN_PASSES) return 0; if (!fp->aux->extable || -- 2.53.0