From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794061137; b=BXlwpI7RB5hbEBainTZA2JhtRc8CmI699ycjRlf9qBx24ZE7PlIvhCtSqJGqlrwjwpfa XAxYoalO/wkFz6W15pm6jW5dP6Gedf0ufFGeTEX8JlrSNTejXjM8Lb2+pyg6gPIu9Ri2N 4HJ/6f9+UHI99ygFRE98Olj2mEZQRe9VcUFus3dc1p8ymYPHk5FwQwIk9+LXLcW1QxXh7 q1kuqOYLdRM8cG7rRSUeAfuo5QGUb4mFla9tFKjAlTjLjXk8kqYndO3EglJmAA73M0Q8d YY6C/d3OEnHQXX3RljwFcXYEkg9sN+3L2iGji4j2T8S3kw6Y+VBZGH8ES55ghM27DxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794061137; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:User-Agent:X-stable:X-Patchwork-Hint: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=X8eUw6q5qPyTXuZlwEG/slsMtIht3kmp7ECDjjyepNk=; b=X4aSD7Py+1Wc3pwiKFWRBmH+Ef7m8+XasHyoM89sUKoxFTMhgdai7gffOpwPxp79UUOF 2tGNz7qcMrej9DOlqWbkrFjezYQox7sIKLo/RTKLhTZEjormBXpq3QxIMLOGlzRZR0OJd afzHQqq/8lP3pFPO9j61Z8OC7WbOgUyh5Y3VDU88fM68nyzwwrpEVTS413Zi6C7JR8nUn sCAASSJoTosj8ISNRjefYbWzsjmNi2ipglUVbTaUDwLp/9l045fK6AwfcAE6kO/TNAK6S VtaqHma/6lt+pO9YDgH+IcStqyJ9t/vWQP8aS5HOBt73DMnehQJ4No+8tsVAYWhJugw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b="ZSSZH/aw"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF44606D817; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 14:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=ZSSZH/aw Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 591D11F0089F; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 14:18:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1794061136; bh=X8eUw6q5qPyTXuZlwEG/slsMtIht3kmp7ECDjjyepNk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ZSSZH/awLb/PToLsYtFTcqAgnW42FvJtNTLSCprrfpD2p/0GiBfPeR63+y+mPq4gq HKjYTOiGuGQovBGs6ca6iPAAyXpavTYtTnpRXQX7oML3LQwsRCKbAB311qFhdsIn6G hcJCe2aziH8td9onzBXl2N/eU6gniMXQTNjUARyE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Gopel , Mika Westerberg Subject: [PATCH 6.12 0445/1536] thunderbolt: Do not RPM complete unrelated subtrees on unplug Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 08:41:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20261107135010.042187849@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.56.0 In-Reply-To: <20261107134957.653319350@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20261107134957.653319350@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jonathan Gopel commit 96a8479804e3f7af43e639e9df39f562f1a75fd5 upstream. When a Thunderbolt device is unplugged, that switch and every switch subsequent to it on the bus device list is `complete()`d, not just its child devices. In the case of multiple domains, it may cause, eg, an attempt to `complete()` the uninitialized domain 1 root switch RPM completion on unplug of a switch from domain 0 (though ordering is not guaranteed numerically sorted). I initially noticed this issue on a Dell XPS9720 when the system would seem to sporadically not wake after unplugging a Thunderbolt dock. I tried multiple kernel versions including v7.2.7 and v7.3-rc4 to see if that resolved the issue, but the issue persisted. Eventually I found that I could consistently generate a kernel Oops reporting a page fault at 0xffff_ffff_ffff_fff8 on unplug from one side of the laptop and went bug hunting. I became suspicious of the `bus_for_each_dev()` walk that I ultimately ended up changing. To confirm this issue, I did an eBPF trace of `bus_for_each_dev()`, `complete_rpm()`, and `complete()` while unplugging in a variety of situations and found that an unplug from domain 0 tries to `complete_rpm()` domain 1's switch, whose RPM completion is not initialized and thus is holding a null wait-list pointer, triggering the page fault. Here are the key sections of that eBPF trace. Note that HEAD denotes the completion's own wait-list HEAD: ``` RESCAN_ENTER domain=0 COMPLETE rescan_domain=0 target=0-1 target_domain=0 route=0x1 parent=0-0 unplugged=1 COMPLETION done=0 head=HEAD next=HEAD prev=HEAD BUS_WALK domain=0 start=0-1 callback=complete_rpm CALLBACK_ENTER rescan_domain=0 dev=1-0 parent=domain1 is_switch=1 COMPLETE rescan_domain=0 target=1-0 target_domain=1 route=0x0 parent=domain1 unplugged=0 COMPLETION done=0 head=HEAD next=0 prev=0 complete+5 complete_rpm+43 bus_for_each_dev+133 icm_free_unplugged_children+250 icm_rescan_work+42 ``` This patch gates the `complete()` on an additional condition - that the Thunderbolt domain matches the domain of the device that was unplugged. I only have a single system with multiple Thunderbolt domains - the Dell XPS9720. I am consistently able to reproduce the Oops on that system. Since running with this patch, I have not seen the Oops reoccur. I have also tested it on a Thinkpad X1-Gen12, and that system boots and runs well with it, but it only has a single Thunderbolt domain, so it does not exercise the multi-domain failure case. Fixes: 4f7c2e0d8765 ("thunderbolt: Make sure device runtime resume completes before taking domain lock") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gopel Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/thunderbolt/icm.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/icm.c +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/icm.c @@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ static int complete_rpm(struct device *d { struct tb_switch *sw = tb_to_switch(dev); - if (sw) + if (sw && sw->tb == data) complete(&sw->rpm_complete); return 0; } @@ -2050,8 +2050,8 @@ static void remove_unplugged_switch(stru * tb_switch_remove() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() that then waits * for it. */ - complete_rpm(&sw->dev, NULL); - bus_for_each_dev(&tb_bus_type, &sw->dev, NULL, complete_rpm); + complete_rpm(&sw->dev, sw->tb); + bus_for_each_dev(&tb_bus_type, &sw->dev, sw->tb, complete_rpm); tb_switch_remove(sw); pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(parent);