From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 0/9] io_uring fixes for 6.12-stable
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 09:15:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107161606.2500384-1-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
Hi Greg,
Here are io_uring fixes for 6.12-stable. They were waiting on the
io_uring pull for 7.4-rc, which Linus has now merged.
They apply on top of v6.12.116 with the current queue-6.12 applied
(stable-queue 0ae08d01c389). They don't depend on anything in the queue,
and apply to v6.12.116 alone as well.
The io_uring series I sent earlier this week is already in queue-6.12,
these go on top of that.
Please take patches 1-3 together. Patch 2 closes a race that patch 1
opens up, and patch 3 fixes a WARN_ON_ONCE() that patch 2 introduces on
SQPOLL thread exit.
Patches 1, 6, 8 and 9 needed changes to apply to 6.12, the [axboe: ...]
note at the end of each says what was changed.
Chris Mason (1):
io_uring/cancel: drop sqd->lock while SQPOLL waits
Jens Axboe (3):
io_uring/sqpoll: don't attach to a thread that is canceling
io_uring/poll: don't poll a writer for a read side hangup
io_uring/poll: don't poll a writer for urgent data
Shakeel Butt (1):
io_uring/sqpoll: do the return-to-userspace work in the SQPOLL thread
Shang En Sim (2):
io_uring/cancel: count all requests that a CANCEL_ALL cancels
io_uring/poll: cancel all matching requests in one pass
Shuai Liu (1):
io_uring/sqpoll: don't set IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP on thread exit
Yuansheng Yang (1):
io_uring/rsrc: hold uring_lock across index-alloc put_user
io_uring/cancel.c | 3 +-
io_uring/io_uring.c | 23 +++++++++++++-
io_uring/poll.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
io_uring/rsrc.c | 21 ++++++++++---
io_uring/sqpoll.c | 26 ++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 16:15 Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-11-07 16:15 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/9] io_uring/cancel: drop sqd->lock while SQPOLL waits Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:15 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/9] io_uring/sqpoll: don't attach to a thread that is canceling Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/9] io_uring/sqpoll: don't set IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP on thread exit Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/9] io_uring/sqpoll: do the return-to-userspace work in the SQPOLL thread Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 5/9] io_uring/cancel: count all requests that a CANCEL_ALL cancels Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 6/9] io_uring/poll: cancel all matching requests in one pass Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 7/9] io_uring/poll: don't poll a writer for a read side hangup Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 8/9] io_uring/poll: don't poll a writer for urgent data Jens Axboe
2026-11-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 9/9] io_uring/rsrc: hold uring_lock across index-alloc put_user Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-11-04 18:43 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/9] io_uring fixes for 6.12-stable Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261107161606.2500384-1-axboe@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox