Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: josef@toxicpanda.com, ljs@kernel.org, usama.anjum@arm.com,
	david@kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/mmu_notifier: finish non-blocking interval invalidation on error" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon,  9 Nov 2026 20:28:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109202809-failed-5.10-6d65925777ec@kernel.org> (raw)

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 6d65925777ecae9d7a571a327e41c63f3940a0c7
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '20261109202809-failed-5.10-6d65925777ec@kernel.org' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' 'HEAD^..'

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 6d65925777ecae9d7a571a327e41c63f3940a0c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 10:39:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmu_notifier: finish non-blocking interval invalidation on
 error

When an ordinary MMU notifier rejects a non-blocking invalidation, the
interval invalidation started beforehand is left unfinished: the caller
skips mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(). Subsequent interval notifier
operations can then wait forever.

The only in-tree trigger is nouveau SVM, which uses both notifier types
and rejects non-blocking invalidations. Reaping via the OOM reaper or
process_mrelease() can therefore leave the GPU fault worker stuck,
holding a reference that prevents the dying process's address space
and memory from being freed.

End the interval invalidation when an ordinary notifier fails a
non-blocking invalidation, like mn_itree_invalidate() already does when
an interval notifier fails. Make that handling clearer in the
documentation of mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_nonblock().

Fix generated by an LLM and sent by Josef Bacik in private.

Fixes: 99cb252f5e68 ("mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[ david: simplify description, update function doc ]
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261031-fixes_core-v3-28-d6437171ecc3@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/mmu_notifier.h |  3 ++-
 mm/mmu_notifier.c            | 17 +++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index a11a44eef521e..5db78e5761c5c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -483,7 +483,8 @@ mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 /*
  * This version of mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() avoids blocking, but it
  * can return an error if a notifier can't proceed without blocking, in which
- * case you're not allowed to modify PTEs in the specified range.
+ * case you're not allowed to modify PTEs in the specified range or call
+ * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end().
  *
  * This is mainly intended for OOM handling.
  */
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index df69ba6e797f7..2e20f88e162d7 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -569,16 +569,25 @@ int __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
 {
 	struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions =
 		range->mm->notifier_subscriptions;
-	int ret;
+	const bool has_itree = subscriptions->has_itree;
+	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (subscriptions->has_itree) {
+	if (has_itree) {
 		ret = mn_itree_invalidate(subscriptions, range);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
 	if (!hlist_empty(&subscriptions->list))
-		return mn_hlist_invalidate_range_start(subscriptions, range);
-	return 0;
+		ret = mn_hlist_invalidate_range_start(subscriptions, range);
+
+	/*
+	 * On error, the non-blocking caller is not allowed to call
+	 * invalidate_range_end(), as in mn_itree_invalidate().
+	 */
+	if (ret && has_itree && !mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
+		mn_itree_inv_end(subscriptions);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.53.0





                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261109202809-failed-5.10-6d65925777ec@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox