Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
	Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
	Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y 2/2] wifi: rtw88: TX report with long timeout for non-PCIE devices
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:00:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110135943.1815342-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110135943.1815342-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

[ Upstream commit 7cde94dab0e74434ccc0a387d7ad373fb3becda0 ]

Many USB and SDIO devices can't report TX status within 500 ms, and
extending to 2500 ms as tested USB/SDIO devices can fix the problem [1].
To avoid adding chip ID one by one, and this change looks harmless.
Keep PCIE using short timeout, and others use long timeout.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260921165343.8131-1-pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com/

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260924004637.9958-1-pkshih@realtek.com
[ sashal: adjusted context for a timeout condition without the rtw_is_8723bs() check ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c | 9 +++++----
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
index 2de200ab7ab61..b5132a963e5f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void rtw_tx_report_purge_timer(struct timer_list *t)
 void rtw_tx_report_enqueue(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 sn)
 {
 	struct rtw_tx_report *tx_report = &rtwdev->tx_report;
-	unsigned long timeout = RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT;
+	unsigned long timeout;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u8 *drv_data;
 
@@ -180,9 +180,10 @@ void rtw_tx_report_enqueue(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 sn)
 	__skb_queue_tail(&tx_report->queue, skb);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_report->q_lock, flags);
 
-	if (rtwdev->chip->id == RTW_CHIP_TYPE_8723D &&
-	    rtwdev->hci.type == RTW_HCI_TYPE_USB)
-		timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(2500);
+	if (rtwdev->hci.type == RTW_HCI_TYPE_PCIE)
+		timeout = RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT_SHORT;
+	else
+		timeout = RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT_LONG;
 
 	mod_timer(&tx_report->purge_timer, jiffies + timeout);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h
index 6673dbcaa21c1..25aafbed6ed8d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.h
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
 
 #define RTK_TX_MAX_AGG_NUM_MASK		0x1f
 
-#define RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT		msecs_to_jiffies(500)
+#define RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT_SHORT	msecs_to_jiffies(500)
+#define RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT_LONG	msecs_to_jiffies(2500)
 
 #define SET_TX_DESC_TXPKTSIZE(txdesc, value)                                   \
 	le32p_replace_bits((__le32 *)(txdesc) + 0x00, value, GENMASK(15, 0))
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07 11:17 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] wifi: rtw88: TX report with long timeout for non-PCIE devices" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 14:00 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/2] wifi: rtw88: increase TX report timeout to fix race condition Sasha Levin
2026-11-10 14:00   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261110135943.1815342-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox