From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
co+fd80bc5967eb22c3@bugs.sh,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] usb: xhci: Fix bounce buffer overflow
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:50:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111015023.442697-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107053331-failed-6.6-68c5cb7574c5@kernel.org>
From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 68c5cb7574c567e83ba95258cb146db95e069a87 ]
High-speed devices with out of spec 1024 byte bulk endpoints exist and
are allowed by USB core, but xhci-hcd always sets packet size to 512.
The exact nature of these devices isn't documented, commit fb5ee84ea72c
("USB: Accept bulk endpoints with 1024-byte maxpacket") only states
that they "don't work with xHCI host controllers", whatever it means.
But somebody (or a malicious device) can try, and then the driver will
allocate a 512 byte bounce buffer for this endpoint and may write up to
1024 bytes into it if particular scatter-gather URBs are used, because
xhci_align_td() obtains packet size from the descriptor. Fix this.
As a side effect, TRBs will be aligned to the packet size chosen by the
driver on all endpoints of all speeds. Alignment serves the xHC, not
device, so this is fine. Only out of spec devices are affected anyway.
Reported-by: co+fd80bc5967eb22c3@bugs.sh
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/D4tcSGerkYkIV1DmaUo1t8TaR5qQElDLkidn@bugs.sh/
Fixes: f9c589e142d0 ("xhci: TD-fragment, align the unsplittable case with a bounce buffer")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261009151624.618967-11-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ sashal: adapted the max_pkt assignment removal to match usb_endpoint_maxp() instead of xhci_usb_endpoint_maxp() ]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 66c399253a9b4..3794492b16ec2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -3644,15 +3644,13 @@ static u32 xhci_td_remainder(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, int transferred,
static int xhci_align_td(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct urb *urb, u32 enqd_len,
- u32 *trb_buff_len, struct xhci_segment *seg)
+ u32 *trb_buff_len, struct xhci_segment *seg, u32 max_pkt)
{
struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
unsigned int unalign;
- unsigned int max_pkt;
u32 new_buff_len;
size_t len;
- max_pkt = usb_endpoint_maxp(&urb->ep->desc);
unalign = (enqd_len + *trb_buff_len) % max_pkt;
/* we got lucky, last normal TRB data on segment is packet aligned */
@@ -3797,9 +3795,8 @@ int xhci_queue_bulk_tx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
if (enqd_len + trb_buff_len < full_len) {
field |= TRB_CHAIN;
if (trb_is_link(ring->enqueue + 1)) {
- if (xhci_align_td(xhci, urb, enqd_len,
- &trb_buff_len,
- ring->enq_seg)) {
+ if (xhci_align_td(xhci, urb, enqd_len, &trb_buff_len,
+ ring->enq_seg, ring->bounce_buf_len)) {
send_addr = ring->enq_seg->bounce_dma;
/* TD bounced at least, and last on this seg */
td->bounce_seg = ring->enq_seg;
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 10:33 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix bounce buffer overflow" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 1:50 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111015023.442697-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=co+fd80bc5967eb22c3@bugs.sh \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox