Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 2/3] mm/ksm: fix KSM COW breaking with userfaultfd-wp via FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 18:50:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111105034.51632-3-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111105034.51632-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>

From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Let's stop breaking COW via a fake write fault and let's use
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE instead.  This avoids any wrong side effects of the
fake write fault, such as mapping the PTE writable and marking the pte
dirty/softdirty.

Consequently, we will no longer trigger a fake write fault and break COW
without any such side-effects.

Also, this fixes KSM interaction with userfaultfd-wp: when we have a KSM
page that's write-protected by userfaultfd, break_ksm()->handle_mm_fault()
will fail with VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and will simply return in break_ksm() with
0 instead of actually breaking COW.

For now, the KSM unmerge tests can trigger that:
    $ sudo ./ksm_functional_tests
    TAP version 13
    1..3
    # [RUN] test_unmerge
    ok 1 Pages were unmerged
    # [RUN] test_unmerge_discarded
    ok 2 Pages were unmerged
    # [RUN] test_unmerge_uffd_wp
    not ok 3 Pages were unmerged
    Bail out! 1 out of 3 tests failed
    # Planned tests != run tests (2 != 3)
    # Totals: pass:2 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

The warning in dmesg also indicates this wrong handling:
    [  230.096368] FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY missing 881
    [  230.100822] CPU: 1 PID: 1643 Comm: ksm-uffd-wp [...]
    [  230.110124] Hardware name: [...]
    [  230.117775] Call Trace:
    [  230.120227]  <TASK>
    [  230.122334]  dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c
    [  230.126010]  handle_userfault.cold+0x14/0x19
    [  230.130281]  ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x65/0x170
    [  230.134207]  ? uffd_wp_range+0x65/0xa0
    [  230.137959]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
    [  230.141972]  ? do_wp_page+0x50/0x590
    [  230.145551]  __handle_mm_fault+0x9f5/0xf50
    [  230.149652]  ? mmput+0x1f/0x40
    [  230.152712]  handle_mm_fault+0xb9/0x2a0
    [  230.156550]  break_ksm+0x141/0x180
    [  230.159964]  unmerge_ksm_pages+0x60/0x90
    [  230.163890]  ksm_madvise+0x3c/0xb0
    [  230.167295]  do_madvise.part.0+0x10c/0xeb0
    [  230.171396]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
    [  230.175157]  __x64_sys_madvise+0x5a/0x70
    [  230.179082]  do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
    [  230.182661]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
    [  230.186413]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

This is primarily a fix for KSM+userfaultfd-wp, however, the fake write
fault was always questionable.  As this fix is not easy to backport and
it's not very critical, let's not cc stable.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021101141.84170-6-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 529b930b87d9 ("userfaultfd: wp: hook userfault handler to write protection fault")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

(cherry picked from commit 6cce3314b928b2db7d5f48171e18314226551c3f)
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
---
 mm/ksm.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 9a050fa88b85..b052f6141b6e 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -421,17 +421,15 @@ static inline bool ksm_test_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
 }
 
 /*
- * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page: it's a stripped down
+ * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page by triggering unsharing,
+ * such that the ksm page will get replaced by an exclusive anonymous page.
  *
- *	if (get_user_pages(addr, 1, FOLL_WRITE, &page, NULL) == 1)
- *		put_page(page);
- *
- * but taking great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma,
+ * We take great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma,
  * in case the application has unmapped and remapped mm,addr meanwhile.
  * Could a ksm page appear anywhere else?  Actually yes, in a VM_PFNMAP
  * mmap of /dev/mem, where we would not want to touch it.
  *
- * FAULT_FLAG/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context
+ * FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context
  * of the process that owns 'vma'.  We also do not want to enforce
  * protection keys here anyway.
  */
@@ -455,7 +453,7 @@ static int break_ksm(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
 		if (!ksm_page)
 			return 0;
 		ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr,
-				      FAULT_FLAG_WRITE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,
+				      FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,
 				      NULL);
 	} while (!(ret & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV | VM_FAULT_OOM)));
 	/*
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  1:17 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/ksm: fix userfaultfd protection during merge and unmerge" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-11 10:50 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 0/3] mm/ksm: fix userfaultfd protection on 6.1 Lance Yang
2026-11-11 10:50   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/3] mm/ksm: simplify break_ksm() to not rely on VM_FAULT_WRITE Lance Yang
2026-11-11 10:50   ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-11-11 10:50   ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/3] mm/ksm: fix userfaultfd protection during merge and unmerge Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261111105034.51632-3-lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox