Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y 2/2] xfrm: retry inexact policy lookup after node reinsertion
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 11:07:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261114160719.3922066-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114160719.3922066-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 868f63c8bfafa9b827168c9126f85264c39c02ec ]

An inexact policy lookup first records pointers to candidate hlist heads
and then traverses the lists.  A concurrent policy insertion can merge
inexact tree nodes between those operations:

  lookup                         policy insertion
  ------                         ----------------
  find inexact candidates
    save obsolete hlist head
                                 write_seqcount_begin(&bin->count)
                                 merge inexact tree nodes
                                   hlist_del_rcu(&policy->bydst)
                                   reinsert policy->bydst in survivor
                                 write_seqcount_end(&bin->count)
  evaluate saved candidate list
    miss the moved policy

The merge immediately reinserts the same hlist node into the surviving
tree node.  RCU keeps the policy alive, but it does not provide a
consistent view while its list node is moved.  A lookup that selected the
obsolete list can observe it empty.  A lookup already traversing a moved
policy can instead follow the next pointer rewritten by the reinsertion.
Either case can return an incorrect IPsec policy result.

The per-bin sequence counter already brackets calls to
xfrm_policy_inexact_insert_node(), including node merges.  The read side,
however, currently validates the counter only while searching an
individual rb-tree.  A successful search returns without validation, and
the later candidate-list traversal is outside that read-side section.

Snapshot the per-bin sequence before discovering candidate heads and
validate it after evaluating all candidate lists.   Retry the lookup if
the inexact policy tree changes while it is being searched.

Fixes: 9cf545ebd591 ("xfrm: policy: store inexact policies in a tree ordered by destination address")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 9e18e8d2c1c5c..c48315afead13 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2102,6 +2102,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
 	struct xfrm_pol_inexact_bin *bin;
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol, *ret;
 	struct hlist_head *chain;
+	unsigned int inexact_sequence;
 	unsigned int sequence;
 	int err;
 
@@ -2133,12 +2134,18 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_lookup_bytype(struct net *net, u8 type,
 		}
 	}
 	bin = xfrm_policy_inexact_lookup_rcu(net, type, family, dir, if_id);
-	if (!bin || !xfrm_policy_find_inexact_candidates(&cand, bin, saddr,
-							 daddr))
+	if (!bin)
+		goto skip_inexact;
+
+	inexact_sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&bin->count);
+	if (!xfrm_policy_find_inexact_candidates(&cand, bin, saddr, daddr))
 		goto skip_inexact;
 
 	pol = xfrm_policy_eval_candidates(&cand, ret, fl, type,
 					  family, if_id);
+	if (read_seqcount_retry(&bin->count, inexact_sequence))
+		goto retry;
+
 	if (pol) {
 		ret = pol;
 		if (IS_ERR(pol))
-- 
2.53.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-14 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10  1:20 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfrm: retry inexact policy lookup after node reinsertion" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-11-14 16:07 ` [PATCH 5.15.y 1/2] xfrm: Drop unused argument Sasha Levin
2026-11-14 16:07   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261114160719.3922066-2-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox