From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:40:06 +0200
Message-ID: <2026124.8UngzyUmTA@vostro.rjw.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20130715230825.GA1739@kroah.com>
References: <1373916476.2748.69.camel@dabdike> <51E4712E.5010501@zytor.com> <20130715230825.GA1739@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Monday, July 15, 2013 04:08:25 PM Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:01:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Perhaps the KS topic should be about different stable workflows and what
> > the maintainers' options are, rather than about a specific proposal.
> > This seems like a good discussion topic.
> 
> I agree, that sounds good to me.

+1

Rafael