From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] usb: xhci: Don't skip on Stopped - Length Invalid
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:29:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22876af7-4f9a-40ce-aa9d-2bcab89ce8ae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025030611-twister-synapse-8a99@gregkh>
On 6.3.2025 16.52, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> Why is a patch cc: stable burried here in a series for linux-next? It
> will be many many weeks before it gets out to anyone else, is that
> intentional?
>
> Same for the other commit in this series tagged that way.
These are both kind of half theoretical issues that have been
around for years without more complaints. No need to rush them to
stable. Balance between regression risk vs adding them to stable.
This patch for example states:
"I had no luck producing this sequence of completion events so there
is no compelling demonstration of any resulting disaster. It may be
a very rare, obscure condition. The sole motivation for this patch
is that if such unlikely event does occur, I'd rather risk reporting
a cancelled partially done isoc frame as empty than gamble with UA"
Thanks
Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250306144954.3507700-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
2025-03-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/15] usb: xhci: Don't skip on Stopped - Length Invalid Mathias Nyman
2025-03-06 14:52 ` Greg KH
2025-03-06 15:29 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2025-03-06 15:42 ` Greg KH
2025-03-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] usb: xhci: Apply the link chain quirk on NEC isoc endpoints Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22876af7-4f9a-40ce-aa9d-2bcab89ce8ae@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox