From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168EFEAE7; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738891407; cv=none; b=UOrDwd0UJQpylI+CoM6PYAnPR2yzBvgjQiANFZTUYtvxNmLzz4vDhaPpPRuUkITHscJlW5SC3mxRAJ4iLEfjMWmtKHGYtUrrM2tbwDdxEEiA1l/y17Pj2pLvdkgdOl5/Gq/VILS2B7IzNyshJd6SqqScK9U7fXuNgczVKUX/6po= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738891407; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yW/bitBzJ9mbKepctE1RNJx1uG4S4BG+625p1lFbGic=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=a3K4JYj1E1s/i9sZaA0i1uF+okLLhkEbNWAjNIcQSXP6vbh5cJFqJLAEO4e2dy57mTFNYutvOoy081LkQvZXk+FuSCYIp6dWORsmY9pXkMoBi0ZKnLoPDLzlEKrBvc9hEp53gV65Li4rOFH+19AqWo++9cth3iMByGrIYWBTS9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.191 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Ypx331WHRz1l0hC; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:19:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemo500009.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.194.199]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0669E1402C1; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:23:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.111.104] (10.67.111.104) by kwepemo500009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:22:35 +0800 Message-ID: <273cccc0-bbb1-4377-9ae6-a9c54ed64527@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:22:34 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Patch "hostfs: convert hostfs to use the new mount API" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree Content-Language: en-US To: Greg KH CC: , , , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg References: <20250203162734.2179532-1-sashal@kernel.org> <2025020534-family-upgrade-20fb@gregkh> <52c4c9a3-73a8-40df-ab37-e15b2f4f8496@huawei.com> <2025020654-worst-numbness-ca31@gregkh> From: Hongbo Li In-Reply-To: <2025020654-worst-numbness-ca31@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemo500009.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.199) On 2025/2/6 11:54, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:09:17AM +0800, Hongbo Li wrote: >> Well, by the way, is the patch added because there are use cases for the new >> mount API in hostfs? > > I am sorry, I don't understand the question. > Sorry for my poor expression, I just wonder why this patch should be backported to the 6.6-stable tree. :) Thanks, Hongbo > greg k-h