From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2623E40DFDC for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774450842; cv=none; b=HMzyu7Tg9YX9m/vces7wPz09isG4SFv+f2ls9o1RmRZnMzEnmCrIzBe06JJSMhfJ1EVUQK9CGhyCYfx63jPRs4a2EV5eMLxkqmvSbl1ZFI+hYWc8xkrJdvNIRwr8LXO/54j8OTRaWQ2XCPJOZx/dCCOharMH2rZUsCOcZ2uoGFM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774450842; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PiccF8KIAiz1/9y5gMKzRlxYq88TiQwROOpY/6mzq+Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=gGWLXsSCEScl6Sua37sOyfBETb5s+PV5vbP3NCcTmKBb4IrqrZ1rK/QHNP6DdkKpx0ZUKiO8I2bryQOOutTyx5PsoOY4F+HO5PVi7wcoUWzB32xJSNv9vUFhP4110suu9nLGYjtUd4DLKk8F8yQqOmO+AhkYm1HbmLeCgc5RxU4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=fC4wFbx9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="fC4wFbx9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774450841; x=1805986841; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PiccF8KIAiz1/9y5gMKzRlxYq88TiQwROOpY/6mzq+Y=; b=fC4wFbx9V08ACYA4cSrzLr5dNtTURjdWD7NgsGfjwakaquUV8QLZ2j2O dv9IkwiWFlqsi4pBkK3J+YGQksxby5Hl9QFFECnd2GL2JZzXMult9XLy0 SZ/5E0nihaJSc1tAmabXM2RUTTm47sZCpljtfa1Iw5fMhIUhjFSfS3rqD srMdyyMvNQLYxvizODzyhQrVoXnW+4EaynwolA6BrYm8BZ80+6+t3oij8 inFw4Dd8/zL7uTnt4Hf+hIuzgYknwGxiFwcPRXtM+LjgsF0WQXPmH2rvP 3akdtc5miCL3oZogcbWCO9T/B65Dvvdt+/TOse6y1eqtjnC2RNOipnrNV g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DQoKWCBNRcKX4B1AVfMl5w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wi7i2bkFQxiPnnJtDQKI+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11740"; a="74670256" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,140,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="74670256" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2026 08:00:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ddgBB4qCTe+X4lgCNppT8A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uxptITx9Rni/S3pZZdLe6Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,140,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="229162209" Received: from rchatre-mobl4.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.110.56]) ([10.125.110.56]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2026 08:00:40 -0700 Message-ID: <2c036114-72c8-4695-8bba-a9c642df5519@intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:38 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.19 378/378] cxl/acpi: Fix CXL_ACPI and CXL_PMEM Kconfig tristate mismatch To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Keith Busch , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Cameron , Dan Williams References: <20260317163006.959177102@linuxfoundation.org> <20260317163020.886316423@linuxfoundation.org> <551037c4-665e-4701-9689-a75bdabe4211@intel.com> <2026032511-construct-blurt-07cf@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Dave Jiang In-Reply-To: <2026032511-construct-blurt-07cf@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/25/26 1:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 09:49:43AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: >> >> >> On 3/24/26 9:45 AM, Keith Busch wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 05:35:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> 6.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >>> >>> No objection, but a little confused how this got to stable before >>> landing in Linus' tree. Does stable pull directly from downstream >>> subsystems now? >>> >>> Speaking of upstream, will the CXL maintainers be submitting a pull >>> request for the staged fixes soon? I'm just getting new bug reports from >>> people testing 7.0-rc, so wanted to check in on that. >> >> I can send it today. Looks like I got enough days in linux-next soaking for the PR. >> > > I took it as it was "obviously" correct, fixed reported regressions, and > it was in linux-next and going to Linus "soon". It's now in Linus's tree as of yesterday. We are all good. > > thanks, > > greg k-h