public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
To: <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	"Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix pipe BPP clamping due to HDR
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 17:19:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cbfae41-a000-4b54-99c3-964a06f97bc2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYmyafbsHVRH2crC@ideak-desk.lan>



On 2/9/2026 3:39 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 11:34:34AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:55:21PM +0530, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/9/2026 2:10 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 12:06:20PM +0530, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/6/2026 7:20 PM, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 4:12 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
>>>>>>> The pipe BPP value shouldn't be set outside of the source's / sink's
>>>>>>> valid pipe BPP range, ensure this when increasing the minimum pipe BPP
>>>>>>> value to 30 due to HDR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: ba49a4643cf53 ("drm/i915/dp: Set min_bpp limit to 30 in HDR mode")
>>>>>>> Cc: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.18+
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/
>>>>>>> drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>> index 2b8f43e211741..4d8f480cf803f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>>>>>> @@ -2697,6 +2697,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp
>>>>>>> *intel_dp,
>>>>>>>                        bool dsc,
>>>>>>>                        struct link_config_limits *limits)
>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>> +    struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
>>>>>>>         bool is_mst = intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST);
>>>>>>>         struct intel_connector *connector =
>>>>>>>             to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
>>>>>>> @@ -2709,8 +2710,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp
>>>>>>> *intel_dp,
>>>>>>>         limits->min_lane_count = intel_dp_min_lane_count(intel_dp);
>>>>>>>         limits->max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
>>>>>>> -    limits->pipe.min_bpp = intel_dp_in_hdr_mode(conn_state) ? 30 :
>>>>>>> -                intel_dp_min_bpp(crtc_state->output_format);
>>>>>>> +    limits->pipe.min_bpp = intel_dp_min_bpp(crtc_state->output_format);
>>>>>>>         if (is_mst) {
>>>>>>>             /*
>>>>>>>              * FIXME: If all the streams can't fit into the link with their
>>>>>>> @@ -2726,6 +2726,16 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_limits(struct
>>>>>>> intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>>>>>                                 respect_downstream_limits);
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>> +    if (intel_dp_in_hdr_mode(conn_state)) {
>>>>>>> +        if (limits->pipe.min_bpp <= 30 && limits->pipe.max_bpp >= 30)
>>>>>>> +            limits->pipe.min_bpp = 30;
>>>>>>> +        else
>>>>>>> +            drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
>>>>>>> +                    "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] HDR min 30 bpp outside of
>>>>>>> valid pipe bpp range (%d-%d)\n",
>>>>>>> +                    connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name,
>>>>>>> +                    limits->pipe.min_bpp, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pipe.max_bpp < 30 will be either due to the max_bpc property set to less
>>>>>> than 10, or perhaps when the panel itself does not support 10 bpc
>>>>>> (limited by EDID or VBT).
>>>>>> With these constraints doesn't make sense to enable HDR and send HDR
>>>>>> metadata.
>>>>>> However, as we see in some reported issues [1] [2], in practice some
>>>>>> compositor seems to enable HDR by default and with the hard limit set,
>>>>>> they report blankout.
>>>>>> So it does make sense to raise the min bpp limit only if its inside the
>>>>>> supported range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/7052
>>>>>> [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/
>>>>>> issues/5969#note_3248404
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure if this patch would help with the above gitlabs. For example
>>>>> in case of #7052 pipe max bpp is 30 and the commit still fails.
>>>>
>>>> It does fix though reported cases where the sink does not support 10 BPC
>>>> at all. Yes the monitor in #7052 is still a problem, since it supports
>>>> 10 BPC only with lower resolution, where the link BW would allow this
>>>> and he monitor doesn't have DSC either.
>>>>
>>>>> However, I need to look deeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am thinking of relaxing this restriction all together because the earlier
>>>>> assumption that a panel advertising HDR will support atleast 10bpc in all
>>>>> it's mode turns out to be false.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, I am inclined on the following policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> - If DSC is not available, fall back to normal bandwidth calculations and
>>>>> select the highest bpp the link can support. (Also preferred by Kwin)
>>>>>
>>>>> - If DSC is available, prefer falling back to DSC and attempt the highest
>>>>> bpp allowed by bandwidth constraints.
>>>>
>>>> The patch does the above, except for not handling the case where the
>>>> monitor doesn't support DSC. The attach patch handles that too and so
>>>> fixes #7052 as well, are you ok with it?
>>>
>>> This should work since [1] did.
>>
>> I think the sink / source support for 10 BPC should be still checked as
>> in this patch.

Agreed.

>>
>>> There is one more (theoritical) scenario that I think is still not covered.
>>> What happens in a case where 30bpp doesnot fit into DSC bandwidth?
>>> As I understand, the min bpp limit of 30bpp would become a bottle-neck even
>>> then?
>>
>> No, the link BW requirement is determined by the link BPP, not the pipe
>> BPP for which the minimum is set. The link BPP in DSC mode can be
>> lowered below that, based on the sink's minimum compressed BPP support.
>> So in the fallback case, where 30 BPP uncompressed mode is not
>> supported by the sink due to a BW limit, DSC is used instead lowering
>> the compressed link BPP as required.
> 
> Although, it's still possible that the sink wouldn't support the minimum
> pipe BPP set here as a DSC input BPP. Setting a minimum (pipe/input) BPP
> in DSC mode isn't actually needed, since the highest possible BPP will
> be selected there anyway. So I think the actual condition for setting
> pipe.min_bpp = 30 above should be:
> 
>          if (intel_dp_in_hdr_mode(conn_state) &&
>              intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, connector, crtc_state) &&
>              !dsc) {
>              ...
> 

I was trying to make it work within intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide() 
but this works too.

==
Chaitanya

>>> [1] https://github.com/ckborah/drm-tip-sandbox/commit/5dd10a763ae6e651a0ab494ab1ad0c9d81c2de47
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I am working on a patch for this and should be able to float something soon.
>>>>> Imre, if you agree with this policy, would you please wait for the patch.
>>>>> That should make it easier to send out fix for stable kernels.
>>>>>
>>>>> ==
>>>>> Chaitanya
>>>>>
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>         if (dsc && !intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(connector,
>>>>>>> limits))
>>>>>>>             return false;
>>>>>
>>>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-09 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-06 10:42 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Fix pipe BPP clamping due to HDR Imre Deak
2026-02-06 13:50 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-09  6:36   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-02-09  8:40     ` Imre Deak
2026-02-09  9:25       ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-02-09  9:34         ` Imre Deak
2026-02-09 10:09           ` Imre Deak
2026-02-09 11:30             ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-09 11:54               ` Imre Deak
2026-02-09 12:45                 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-09 13:08                   ` Imre Deak
2026-02-09 11:49             ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2cbfae41-a000-4b54-99c3-964a06f97bc2@intel.com \
    --to=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox