From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, vegard.nossum@oracle.com,
syzbot+54cbbfb4db9145d26fc2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y 11/15] io_uring/msg_ring: ensure io_kiocb freeing is deferred for RCU
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 14:47:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <368617ee-8e77-4fec-81cd-45ee3d3532bb@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025090622-crispy-germproof-3d11@gregkh>
On 9/6/25 12:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 07:23:00PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/5/25 1:58 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 9/5/25 5:04 AM, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>>>> index 5ce332fc6ff5..3b27d9bcf298 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring_types.h
>>>> @@ -648,6 +648,8 @@ struct io_kiocb {
>>>> struct io_task_work io_task_work;
>>>> /* for polled requests, i.e. IORING_OP_POLL_ADD and async armed poll */
>>>> struct hlist_node hash_node;
>>>> + /* for private io_kiocb freeing */
>>>> + struct rcu_head rcu_head;
>>>> /* internal polling, see IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL */
>>>> struct async_poll *apoll;
>>>> /* opcode allocated if it needs to store data for async defer */
>>>
>>> This should go into a union with hash_node, rather than bloat the
>>> struct. That's how it was done upstream, not sure why this one is
>>> different?
>>
>> Here's a test variant with that sorted. Greg, I never got a FAILED email
>> on this one, as far as I can tell. When a patch is marked with CC:
>> stable@vger.kernel.org and the origin of the bug clearly marked with
>> Fixes, I'm expecting to have a 100% reliable notification if it fails to
>> apply. If not, I just kind of assume patches flow into stable.
>>
>> Was this missed on my side, or was it on the stable side? If the latter,
>> how did that happen? I always ensure that stable has what it needs and
>> play nice on my side, but if misses like this can happen with the
>> tooling, that makes me a bit nervous.
>>
>
> This looks like a failure on my side, sorry. I don't see any FAILED
> email that went out for this anywhere, so I messed up.
>
> sorry about that, and Harshit, thanks for noticing it.
Thanks for confirming, because I was worried it was on my side. But I
thought these things were fully automated? I'm going to add something on
my side to catch these in the future, just in case.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-06 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 11:03 [PATCH 6.12.y 00/15] Backport few CVE fixes to 6.12.y Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 01/15] fs/fhandle.c: fix a race in call of has_locked_children() Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 02/15] net: dsa: add hook to determine whether EEE is supported Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 03/15] net: dsa: provide implementation of .support_eee() Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 04/15] net: dsa: b53/bcm_sf2: implement .support_eee() method Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 05/15] net: dsa: b53: do not enable EEE on bcm63xx Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 06/15] md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 07/15] md/raid1,raid10: don't handle IO error for REQ_RAHEAD and REQ_NOWAIT Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:03 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 08/15] md/raid1,raid10: strip REQ_NOWAIT from member bios Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 09/15] ext4: define ext4_journal_destroy wrapper Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 10/15] ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 11/15] io_uring/msg_ring: ensure io_kiocb freeing is deferred for RCU Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 19:58 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-06 1:23 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-06 18:36 ` Greg KH
2025-09-06 20:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-09-06 21:04 ` Greg KH
2025-09-06 22:39 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-06 2:17 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-06 18:37 ` Greg KH
2025-09-06 20:45 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 12/15] wifi: ath11k: update channel list in reg notifier instead reg worker Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 13/15] wifi: ath11k: update channel list in worker when wait flag is set Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 14/15] net: fix NULL pointer dereference in l3mdev_l3_rcv Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-05 11:04 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 15/15] md/md-bitmap: fix wrong bitmap_limit for clustermd when write sb Harshit Mogalapalli
2025-09-07 7:40 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 00/15] Backport few CVE fixes to 6.12.y Greg KH
2025-09-07 8:20 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=368617ee-8e77-4fec-81cd-45ee3d3532bb@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+54cbbfb4db9145d26fc2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox