From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 0.smtp.remotehost.it (0.smtp.remotehost.it [213.190.28.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AECD1898F8; Sat, 5 Jul 2025 13:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.190.28.75 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751723446; cv=none; b=XJ5r26klOTkK2q4qAwrtjKuvqzMiuGyroZBPk2oLG7LZtAN0ejtB5kmZqiAT33hcoVj6FKpAOmTlyGp6B67b+sTkEzEALsyM89uyeQpTtejTCFvc5YQTLMcxeWvetqctUzwjROEWhqhDR+9AYxkWBpBJJZRsnNAmKfINserdMSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751723446; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KTD4FLxcO6O3F0Uz06MomQx86VnuH+P6EQI0R4x2o38=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tB/BEUB4Zx+OrnRsIPlVV5wjcHEH1mmAng+bKWgFEN9dfJ8n7VteqwoRzeg+eXMWnHcMKLKAj8h3agJ48/IFL5w+jTPWSKcLPBwVONpbAhfparbC2kzcCT9elRC0zpP7TVSrEPDZb/NTBKizQCqzZSEJK/lqt2KdlrFFGQzQzgA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hardfalcon.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hardfalcon.net; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hardfalcon.net header.i=@hardfalcon.net header.b=Cq2sO6mj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.190.28.75 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hardfalcon.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hardfalcon.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=hardfalcon.net header.i=@hardfalcon.net header.b="Cq2sO6mj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardfalcon.net; s=dkim_2024-02-03; t=1751723434; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9LH4y+MMMjaudgXUUhlq8KLlA1S4bGHYgtofYcKGx1Y=; b=Cq2sO6mjQJLVOIgUh58Iy9krdhDPfz92QS2Mp53xGH1B8n+pytHwpuwmz1eX7k5MKMSnN0 5kzxIkn3vXqDt9CA== Message-ID: <3ca03800-3d4e-41ca-897d-a0d05d6499ba@hardfalcon.net> Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 15:50:32 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/218] 6.12.36-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org References: <20250703143955.956569535@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Language: en-US, de-DE, en-US-large From: Pascal Ernster In-Reply-To: <20250703143955.956569535@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [2025-07-03 16:39] Greg Kroah-Hartman: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.36 release. > There are 218 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.36-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y Hi Greg, there seems to be a divergence between 6.12.36-rc1 and the current state of queue/6.12 or stable-queue/queue-6.12 (five patches dropped and two modified), but there doesn't seem to be an rc2 - is this intentional? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/diff/?id2=08de5e8741606608ca5489679ec1604bb7f3d777&id=4c3f7f0935ba0c1ca54be4e82cc8f27595ab8e61 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/diff/queue-6.12?id=c0bc2de2a5416da11ffadb0d10da975d1bdb1ada&id2=e1bd69ff09807d5bf80f17f3279240cb223145a6 In any case, I've applied all patches from the current version of stable-queue/queue-6.12 (commit id c0bc2de2a5416da11ffadb0d10da975d1bdb1ada) applied on top of a 6.12.35 kernel, compiled the result with GCC 15.1.0 as part of OpenWRT images for various platforms, and I've booted and tested those images on the following platforms without noticing any issues: - x86_64: Intel Haswell VM - MIPS 4KEc V7.0: Netgear GS108T v3 (SoC: Realtek RTL8380M) - MIPS 4KEc V7.0: Netgear GS310TP v1 (SoC: Realtek RTL8380M) - MIPS 74Kc V5.0: TP-Link Archer C7 v4 (SoC: Qualcomm QCA956X) Not sure it that qualifies for a "Tested-by" though because of the divergence to 6.12.36-rc1. Regards Pascal