From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-113.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-113.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFAD219A7A for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 01:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.113 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767922718; cv=none; b=cFSortNA1Vy9NymFuQubQYiN066GBzxt+GU4gvK8g1q9pnqZpWmYzj0t/J9Ser0+y2tLTqVagXmCygSt45qlo/CdqfwBMntHdL0on018lvxP//k6GlirJcCTnIvQkkWzHFPNAU1qJ7sdiW7CkCLS2mNaSF5FogrwY6mVKlnwpUM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767922718; c=relaxed/simple; bh=orLIRsDOg0Ss/GbNx9zufVXFq3XxXTUfIe0yXogBSzg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tu1GXdWRv5oJXAE5bbGZMXMR6u4+ovXTnAHBahbOIZQDjzOKgkfJG8GNKPYP6pQjTS0hDXsioiHj63ZC/taImMX8EixX33ul4KS6UpAu5b3kloxLlsmOJS+q0zRyQWSFJHDZDNczTu4aDDIn5QbOfEL8KLVGbyn6ei9et8/V1E0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=M0zuihtX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.113 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="M0zuihtX" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1767922713; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=BWPOYhB8c6NttjjGe/ysY/nT7KwQqmra9rrt8ptQzMI=; b=M0zuihtXSzmLGUm27iVwJGgAOEZdMRgavy784AodRd9YYY7dY5Kr8pPff7O2kmzCaw75vJDh+SjGnGCLXsEuB37RyqIyltDbTN1jZZd70bL85whFjv+N5iZY3uAe6v0v8JlO7eAoUBdga7zoviy5AHiyaOeE0XTbeR/7hUdEtUk= Received: from 30.221.147.42(mailfrom:jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WweIlk._1767922712 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 09:38:33 +0800 Message-ID: <3fcc48e7-776a-48b1-80e9-e972054778d3@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:38:29 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [6.6-stable 0/2] mm: two fixes for bdi min_ratio and max_ratio knob To: Greg KH Cc: sashal@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20251211023507.82177-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> <2026010849-omission-sublet-23e3@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Jingbo Xu In-Reply-To: <2026010849-omission-sublet-23e3@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/8/26 7:07 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:35:05AM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote: >> Have no idea why stable branch missed the "fix" tag. > > Because that does not guarantee a patch will ever be backported. See: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > for how to do this properly in the future. > Sorry I though that a 'fix' tag suffices for stable tree. Thanks for the pointer. -- Thanks, Jingbo