From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, izbyshev@ispras.ru
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: Fix io_cqring_wait() not restoring sigmask on" failed to apply to 6.8-stable tree
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:11:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41612754-ed58-41fa-8033-a96ddff4d4a6@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024041501-repulsion-purging-1a06@gregkh>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 810 bytes --]
On 4/15/24 6:36 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 6.8-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
>
> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.8.y
> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> git cherry-pick -x 978e5c19dfefc271e5550efba92fcef0d3f62864
> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> git commit -s
> git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024041501-repulsion-purging-1a06@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.8.y' HEAD^..
Here's the 6.8 version of this.
--
Jens Axboe
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-io_uring-Fix-io_cqring_wait-not-restoring-sigmask-on.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2230 bytes --]
From bc6210111b4314ab32aa81c51e97d6b85d35340a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@ispras.ru>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:55:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: Fix io_cqring_wait() not restoring sigmask on
get_timespec64() failure
Commit 978e5c19dfefc271e5550efba92fcef0d3f62864 upstream.
This bug was introduced in commit 950e79dd7313 ("io_uring: minor
io_cqring_wait() optimization"), which was made in preparation for
adc8682ec690 ("io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll"). The latter
got reverted in cb3182167325 ("Revert "io_uring: Add support for
napi_busy_poll""), so simply undo the former as well.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 950e79dd7313 ("io_uring: minor io_cqring_wait() optimization")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@ispras.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405125551.237142-1-izbyshev@ispras.ru
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 1a9f96ed259e..4fbed58f5a54 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2603,19 +2603,6 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
if (__io_cqring_events_user(ctx) >= min_events)
return 0;
- if (sig) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- if (in_compat_syscall())
- ret = set_compat_user_sigmask((const compat_sigset_t __user *)sig,
- sigsz);
- else
-#endif
- ret = set_user_sigmask(sig, sigsz);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
init_waitqueue_func_entry(&iowq.wq, io_wake_function);
iowq.wq.private = current;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iowq.wq.entry);
@@ -2632,6 +2619,19 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, int min_events,
iowq.timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns());
}
+ if (sig) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+ if (in_compat_syscall())
+ ret = set_compat_user_sigmask((const compat_sigset_t __user *)sig,
+ sigsz);
+ else
+#endif
+ ret = set_user_sigmask(sig, sigsz);
+
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
trace_io_uring_cqring_wait(ctx, min_events);
do {
int nr_wait = (int) iowq.cq_tail - READ_ONCE(ctx->rings->cq.tail);
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-15 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 12:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: Fix io_cqring_wait() not restoring sigmask on" failed to apply to 6.8-stable tree gregkh
2024-04-15 16:11 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41612754-ed58-41fa-8033-a96ddff4d4a6@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=izbyshev@ispras.ru \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox