* [PATCH] PCI: fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus()
@ 2024-12-17 3:54 Ma Ke
2024-12-18 15:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ma Ke @ 2024-12-17 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bhelgaas, rafael.j.wysocki, yinghai
Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, Ma Ke, stable
When device_register(&child->dev) failed, calling put_device() to
explicitly release child->dev. Otherwise, it could cause double free
problem.
Found by code review.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4f535093cf8f ("PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 2e81ab0f5a25..d3146c588d7f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
add_dev:
pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
ret = device_register(&child->dev);
- WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+ put_device(&child->dev);
+ }
pcibios_add_bus(child);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus()
2024-12-17 3:54 [PATCH] PCI: fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus() Ma Ke
@ 2024-12-18 15:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-19 1:39 ` Ma Ke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2024-12-18 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ma Ke, Lukas Wunner, bhelgaas
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki, yinghai, linux-pci, LKML, stable
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Ma Ke wrote:
> When device_register(&child->dev) failed, calling put_device() to
> explicitly release child->dev. Otherwise, it could cause double free
> problem.
>
> Found by code review.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 4f535093cf8f ("PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 2e81ab0f5a25..d3146c588d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
> add_dev:
> pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
> ret = device_register(&child->dev);
> - WARN_ON(ret < 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + WARN_ON(ret < 0);
The usual way is:
if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + put_device(&child->dev);
> + }
>
> pcibios_add_bus(child);
But more serious problem here is that should this code even proceed as if
nothing happened when an error occurs? pci_register_host_bridge() does
proper rollback when device_register() fails but this function doesn't.
Into the same vein, is using WARN_ON() even correct here? Why should this
print a stacktrace if device_register() fails instead of simply printing
and error?
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus()
2024-12-18 15:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
@ 2024-12-19 1:39 ` Ma Ke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ma Ke @ 2024-12-19 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ilpo.jarvinen
Cc: bhelgaas, linux-kernel, linux-pci, lukas, make_ruc2021,
rafael.j.wysocki, stable, yinghai
Ilpo Järvinen<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com> writes:
> > When device_register(&child->dev) failed, calling put_device() to
> > explicitly release child->dev. Otherwise, it could cause double free
> > problem.
> >
> > Found by code review.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 4f535093cf8f ("PCI: Put pci_dev in device tree as early as possible")
> > Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make_ruc2021@163.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 2e81ab0f5a25..d3146c588d7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
> > add_dev:
> > pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
> > ret = device_register(&child->dev);
> > - WARN_ON(ret < 0);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + WARN_ON(ret < 0);
>
> The usual way is:
>
> if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
>
> > + put_device(&child->dev);
> > + }
> >
> > pcibios_add_bus(child);
>
> But more serious problem here is that should this code even proceed as if
> nothing happened when an error occurs? pci_register_host_bridge() does
> proper rollback when device_register() fails but this function doesn't.
>
> Into the same vein, is using WARN_ON() even correct here? Why should this
> print a stacktrace if device_register() fails instead of simply printing
> and error?
Thank you for your guidance and suggestions. I have the same confusion
about the simple handling(WARN_ON()) of errors if device_add() fails.
I am looking forward to receiving guidance and insights from other
experts.
--
Regards,
Ma Ke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-19 1:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-17 3:54 [PATCH] PCI: fix reference leak in pci_alloc_child_bus() Ma Ke
2024-12-18 15:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-19 1:39 ` Ma Ke
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox