From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-m1973179.qiye.163.com (mail-m1973179.qiye.163.com [220.197.31.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F30214813; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.79 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754571467; cv=none; b=r/riXmXSqCz2ZlR+qpsfuTTAGWw4PzucOr5uMzdpmrPIGkDgmxHFxYoWLGnAJDLqE/SA/hJb0PEeeChUNv91EYk0kQItE3qUMbPhe+njnr37qyESDiqFjwj8sA5KqW+4SIuC2N7k35grqzGd3kUFunp8FWl/XaIBN7yhdPbzlyI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754571467; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k/nUmfKwmZtDrpcdCfeCOCkmDLkr2OHuHXY3Yfs5T+I=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jxUL0Kg/9f9rMU3usAM62VzOYMRQFGeKfaogKVs1OA/dFaDeDZm4C/7BzAcdQKah8g60WCxYBWrTUPr//+EEzyFIZBxmsa5uorDQVAB1zHSwS7Yh0PK2lkizkNJMhtOJ81c2yzqDoWOlF4/QwkwuAgTs6+UuksBsYUQFhDUBCuM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=easystack.cn; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=easystack.cn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.79 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=easystack.cn Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=easystack.cn Received: from [192.168.1.94] (unknown [218.94.118.90]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id e4ab39fc; Thu, 7 Aug 2025 20:52:24 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Message-ID: <47bffaac-4158-4978-8658-271157e568ec@easystack.cn> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 20:52:24 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: APEI: EINJ: Fix einj_tab memleak in einj_probe() To: rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, guohanjun@huawei.com, mchehab@kernel.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, lenb@kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20250807115657.503189-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn> From: "zhen.ni" In-Reply-To: <20250807115657.503189-1-zhen.ni@easystack.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Tid: 0a988496fcd50229kunm7f3a541d7eec X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFJQjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlDSUNKVktJSU1KHR8dT0kZSlYVFAkWGhdVGRETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlJSkNVQk9VSkpDVUJLWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKS0lPT09IVUpLS1 VKQktLWQY+ 在 2025/8/7 19:56, Zhen Ni 写道: > Fixes a permanent ACPI table memory leak when einj_probe() return 0 by > adding acpi_put_table(). > Remove the assignment rc = -ENOMEM to allow the function to propagate > the actual return value. > > Fixes: e40213450b53 ("ACPI, APEI, EINJ support") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Zhen Ni > ... I need to withdraw this patch because upon further investigation, the issue it attempted to fix does not actually exist. My apologies for the noise. Please disregard the original patch. Best regards, Zhen