From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, martineau@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check re-re-adding ID 0 signal" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:26:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48550a57-3f26-4747-8421-9bb618ab9a07@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024083033-figure-spelling-0a00@gregkh>
Hi Greg,
On 30/08/2024 12:28, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Thank you for the notification!
(...)
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From f18fa2abf81099d822d842a107f8c9889c86043c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 08:14:38 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check re-re-adding ID 0 signal
>
> This test extends "delete re-add signal" to validate the previous
> commit: when the 'signal' endpoint linked to the initial subflow (ID 0)
> is re-added multiple times, it will re-send the ADD_ADDR with id 0. The
> client should still be able to re-create this subflow, even if the
> add_addr_accepted limit has been reached as this special address is not
> considered as a new address.
>
> The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
> commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests,
> but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit
> ID.
>
> Fixes: d0876b2284cf ("mptcp: add the incoming RM_ADDR support")
Similar to my previous message mentioning that the 'Fixes' tag here is
pointing at the issue in the code, but the test file cannot easily be
patched to validate the issue: no need to worry about that one for v5.15.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-06 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 10:28 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: check re-re-adding ID 0 signal" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2024-09-06 8:26 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48550a57-3f26-4747-8421-9bb618ab9a07@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox