* [PATCH 1/3] TPM: Zero buffer whole after copying to userspace
[not found] <1323196162-2717-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
@ 2011-12-06 18:29 ` Tim Gardner
2012-02-03 17:39 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] TPM: Close data_pending and data_buffer races Tim Gardner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2011-12-06 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Seth Forshee, Tim Gardner, Debora Velarde, Rajiv Andrade,
Marcel Selhorst, tpmdd-devel, stable
Commit 3321c07ae5068568cd61ac9f4ba749006a7185c9 correctly clears the TPM
buffer if the user specified read length is >= the TPM buffer length. However,
if the user specified read length is < the TPM buffer length, then part of the
TPM buffer is left uncleared.
Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
index 361a1df..b366b34 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -1115,12 +1115,13 @@ ssize_t tpm_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
ret_size = atomic_read(&chip->data_pending);
atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
if (ret_size > 0) { /* relay data */
+ ssize_t orig_ret_size = ret_size;
if (size < ret_size)
ret_size = size;
mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
rc = copy_to_user(buf, chip->data_buffer, ret_size);
- memset(chip->data_buffer, 0, ret_size);
+ memset(chip->data_buffer, 0, orig_ret_size);
if (rc)
ret_size = -EFAULT;
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] TPM: Close data_pending and data_buffer races
[not found] <1323196162-2717-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] TPM: Zero buffer whole after copying to userspace Tim Gardner
@ 2011-12-06 18:29 ` Tim Gardner
2011-12-20 16:38 ` Rajiv Andrade
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tim Gardner @ 2011-12-06 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Seth Forshee, Tim Gardner, Debora Velarde, Rajiv Andrade,
Marcel Selhorst, tpmdd-devel, stable
There is a race betwen tpm_read() and tpm_write where both chip->data_pending
and chip->data_buffer can be changed by tpm_write() when tpm_read()
clears chip->data_pending, but before tpm_read() grabs the mutex.
Protect changes to chip->data_pending and chip->data_buffer by expanding
the scope of chip->buffer_mutex.
Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
index b366b34..70bf9e5 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -1074,12 +1074,15 @@ ssize_t tpm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
struct tpm_chip *chip = file->private_data;
size_t in_size = size, out_size;
+ mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
+
/* cannot perform a write until the read has cleared
either via tpm_read or a user_read_timer timeout */
- while (atomic_read(&chip->data_pending) != 0)
+ while (atomic_read(&chip->data_pending) != 0) {
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
-
- mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
+ }
if (in_size > TPM_BUFSIZE)
in_size = TPM_BUFSIZE;
@@ -1112,22 +1115,20 @@ ssize_t tpm_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
flush_work_sync(&chip->work);
- ret_size = atomic_read(&chip->data_pending);
- atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
+ mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
+ ret_size = atomic_xchg(&chip->data_pending, 0);
if (ret_size > 0) { /* relay data */
ssize_t orig_ret_size = ret_size;
if (size < ret_size)
ret_size = size;
- mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
rc = copy_to_user(buf, chip->data_buffer, ret_size);
memset(chip->data_buffer, 0, orig_ret_size);
if (rc)
ret_size = -EFAULT;
-
- mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
return ret_size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_read);
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] TPM: Close data_pending and data_buffer races
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] TPM: Close data_pending and data_buffer races Tim Gardner
@ 2011-12-20 16:38 ` Rajiv Andrade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajiv Andrade @ 2011-12-20 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Gardner
Cc: linux-kernel, Seth Forshee, Debora Velarde, Marcel Selhorst,
tpmdd-devel, stable
On 06/12/11 16:29, Tim Gardner wrote:
> There is a race betwen tpm_read() and tpm_write where both chip->data_pending
> and chip->data_buffer can be changed by tpm_write() when tpm_read()
> clears chip->data_pending, but before tpm_read() grabs the mutex.
>
> Protect changes to chip->data_pending and chip->data_buffer by expanding
> the scope of chip->buffer_mutex.
>
> Reported-by: Seth Forshee<seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> Cc: Debora Velarde<debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rajiv Andrade<srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcel Selhorst<m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
> Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> index b366b34..70bf9e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> @@ -1074,12 +1074,15 @@ ssize_t tpm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> struct tpm_chip *chip = file->private_data;
> size_t in_size = size, out_size;
>
> + mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> +
> /* cannot perform a write until the read has cleared
> either via tpm_read or a user_read_timer timeout */
> - while (atomic_read(&chip->data_pending) != 0)
> + while (atomic_read(&chip->data_pending) != 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> -
> - mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> + mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> + }
>
> if (in_size> TPM_BUFSIZE)
> in_size = TPM_BUFSIZE;
> @@ -1112,22 +1115,20 @@ ssize_t tpm_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>
> del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
> flush_work_sync(&chip->work);
> - ret_size = atomic_read(&chip->data_pending);
> - atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> + mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> + ret_size = atomic_xchg(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> if (ret_size> 0) { /* relay data */
> ssize_t orig_ret_size = ret_size;
> if (size< ret_size)
> ret_size = size;
>
> - mutex_lock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> rc = copy_to_user(buf, chip->data_buffer, ret_size);
> memset(chip->data_buffer, 0, orig_ret_size);
> if (rc)
> ret_size = -EFAULT;
What about just moving atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0); to here?
If I'm not missing anything, this would be cleaner.
Rajiv
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> }
>
> + mutex_unlock(&chip->buffer_mutex);
> return ret_size;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_read);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] TPM: Zero buffer whole after copying to userspace
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] TPM: Zero buffer whole after copying to userspace Tim Gardner
@ 2012-02-03 17:39 ` Rajiv Andrade
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rajiv Andrade @ 2012-02-03 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Gardner
Cc: linux-kernel, Seth Forshee, Debora Velarde, Marcel Selhorst,
tpmdd-devel, stable
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Commit 3321c07ae5068568cd61ac9f4ba749006a7185c9 correctly clears the TPM
> buffer if the user specified read length is >= the TPM buffer length. However,
> if the user specified read length is < the TPM buffer length, then part of the
> TPM buffer is left uncleared.
>
> Reported-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> Cc: Debora Velarde <debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@sirrix.com>
> Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Applied to github.com:srajiv/tpm.git next
Thanks,
Rajiv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-03 17:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1323196162-2717-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] TPM: Zero buffer whole after copying to userspace Tim Gardner
2012-02-03 17:39 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-12-06 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] TPM: Close data_pending and data_buffer races Tim Gardner
2011-12-20 16:38 ` Rajiv Andrade
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).