From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4F50D06E.1020604@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:51:42 +0100 From: Stefan Bader MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [ 00/34] 2.6.32.58-longterm review References: <20120301214654.GA13231@kroah.com> <20120302071914.GC13959@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20120302071914.GC13959@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02.03.2012 08:19, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:46:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: >> NOTE: >> I have NOT tested this rc release. I now no longer own any >> machines that can run the 2.6.32 kernel. Because of this, this >> will be the last 2.6.32-longterm kernel that I will release. I >> will be passing on the .32 kernel to someone else after this >> release. Please, if you care about the .32 kernel, test this >> release, I have _only_ build tested it, and have no idea if I >> got something wrong or not. > > OK, tested here on an atom-based netbook (x86-32+i915 graphics). > WiFi (incl firmware loading), bluetooth (over USB), NFS, suspend/resume, > ACPI were tested with success. So I think that once again you did the job > right till your last release :-) > > Cheers, > Willy > FWIW, tested too on a AMD Turion based laptop (x86_64+ATI X1200 graphics). Ok, not exactly that but the 2.6.32.58+drm33. But that one also did not show obvious problems. -Stefan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html