From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initialize max_pfn_mapped as initial ident mapping size for x86_64
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:49:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F556D3D.8040400@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQV3CyB1YRPDxFu-jGr73+Qwpkn4O4QYYZvBJcyZA5Gouw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/05/2012 05:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> whole history:
> before following patch, on x86_64, for low memory (under 4g) pgtable
> will be allocated just under TOML
> and even those memory is not mapped directly. because now we are using
> early_ioremap to access those
> page table.
>
> but looks it has problem with S4 resume. so good_end is set to initial
> mapped high address.
> (that is 512M). So page table will just below 512M
> but crash kernel is allocated below 768M. so will have no chance to
> get 512M porting for crashkernel.
>
> Now your patch just set initial mapping limit to 1g. but according to
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> we only have initial mapping to 512M.
>
> So you can not just simply set to 1G, that will confuse early
> memblock allocator.
>
> We may update find_early_table_space() to use 1G as good_end for
> x86_64 that will be less confusing.
>
This is crazy. All of it. We shouldn't have a bunch of magic memory
limits on 64 bits, and trying to add and subtract to them really just
makes the pain worse.
WHY does it have a problem with S4 resume? S4 is Linux code, so there
is a bug here that people keep trying to hack around instead of digging
into.
The early mapping range we can fix, and probably should. Mapping the
first 4 GiB is not a lot of memory and makes a much more sensible
starting point.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1330669703-20176-1-git-send-email-zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
2012-03-06 1:35 ` [PATCH] Initialize max_pfn_mapped as initial ident mapping size for x86_64 Yinghai Lu
2012-03-06 1:49 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-03-06 6:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-06 7:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F556D3D.8040400@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).