stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initialize max_pfn_mapped as initial ident mapping size for x86_64
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:49:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F556D3D.8040400@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQV3CyB1YRPDxFu-jGr73+Qwpkn4O4QYYZvBJcyZA5Gouw@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/05/2012 05:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> whole history:
> before following patch, on x86_64, for low memory (under 4g) pgtable
> will be allocated just under TOML
> and even those memory is not mapped directly. because now we are using
> early_ioremap to access those
> page table.
> 
> but looks it has problem with S4 resume. so good_end is set to initial
> mapped high address.
> (that is 512M). So page table will just below 512M
> but crash kernel is allocated below 768M. so will have no chance to
> get 512M porting for crashkernel.
> 
> Now your patch just set initial mapping limit to 1g. but according to
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
> we only have initial mapping to 512M.
> 
> So you can not just simply set to 1G,  that will confuse early
> memblock allocator.
> 
> We may update find_early_table_space() to use 1G as good_end for
> x86_64 that will be less confusing.
> 

This is crazy.  All of it.  We shouldn't have a bunch of magic memory
limits on 64 bits, and trying to add and subtract to them really just
makes the pain worse.

WHY does it have a problem with S4 resume?  S4 is Linux code, so there
is a bug here that people keep trying to hack around instead of digging
into.

The early mapping range we can fix, and probably should.  Mapping the
first 4 GiB is not a lot of memory and makes a much more sensible
starting point.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-06  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1330669703-20176-1-git-send-email-zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
2012-03-06  1:35 ` [PATCH] Initialize max_pfn_mapped as initial ident mapping size for x86_64 Yinghai Lu
2012-03-06  1:49   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-03-06  6:27     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-06  7:00       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F556D3D.8040400@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).