From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, <jeremy@goop.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, AMD: Fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD05CED.60905@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120607072159.GB9856@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
On 06/07/2012 09:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 03:00:14PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/01/2012 07:52 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> From: Andre Przywara<andre.przywara@amd.com>
>>>
>>> f7f286a910221 ("x86/amd: Re-enable CPU topology extensions in case BIOS
>>> has disabled it") wrongfully added code which used the AMD-specific
>>> {rd,wr}msr variants for no real reason.
>>>
>>> This caused boot panics on xen which wasn't initializing the
>>> {rd,wr}msr_safe_regs pv_ops members properly.
>>>
>>> This, in turn, caused a heated discussion leading to us reviewing all
>>> uses of the AMD-specific variants and removing them where unneeded
>>> (almost everywhere except an obscure K8 BIOS fix, see 6b0f43ddfa358).
>>>
>>> Finally, this patch switches to the standard {rd,wr}msr*_safe* variants
>>> which should've been used in the first place anyway and avoided unneeded
>>> excitation with xen.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara<andre.przywara@amd.com>
>>> Cc: Andreas Herrmann<andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4+
>>> Link:<http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1338383402-3838-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com>
>>> [Boris: correct and expand commit message]
>>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov<borislav.petkov@amd.com>
>>
>> Why -stable? I though we had agreed that we didn't have an active
>> problem (unclean hack, yes, but not an active problem) in 3.4/3.5 as it
>> currently sits?
This is probably a leftover from the original patch, before Konrad's
patch got committed.
> Yes, AFAICT, we need at least one fix for 3.4 where the original patch
> f7f286a910221 broke xen.
>
> So either this one or 1ab46fd319bc should be backported to stable, if
> I'm not mistaken. If the second, I'll drop the stable tag from this one
> and resend.
>
> Konrad, what do you want wrt xen paravirt nullptr breakage for
> 3.4-stable?
Greg just sent out the review mail for 1ab46fd319bc, so we can drop the
stable tag from this one.
Regards,
Andre.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ 21/82] x86, amd, xen: Avoid NULL pointer paravirt references
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:03:57 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
CC: <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>, "H.
Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
commit 1ab46fd319bcf1fcd9fb6311727d532b580e4eba upstream.
Stub out MSR methods that aren't actually needed. This fixes a crash
as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems. A bigger patch should be added to
remove the paravirt machinery completely for the methods which
apparently have no users!
.....
--
Andre Przywara
AMD-OSRC (Dresden)
Tel: x29712
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1338562358-28182-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
[not found] ` <1338562358-28182-4-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
2012-06-06 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, AMD: Fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-06 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-07 7:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-07 7:49 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2012-06-07 8:08 ` Greg KH
2012-06-07 8:18 ` Andre Przywara
2012-06-07 13:25 ` [GIT PULL] x86, CPU, AMD: Cleanup AMD-specific MSR-rw users Borislav Petkov
2012-06-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, AMD: Fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD05CED.60905@amd.com \
--to=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).