From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"melvyn2@dnsense.pub" <melvyn2@dnsense.pub>,
"Auld, Matthew" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Defer buffer object shrinker write-backs and GPU waits
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 14:50:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bb385f0f5ff5d40337cafb28dbd7d489758c586.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805074842.11359-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-08-05 at 09:48 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> When the xe buffer-object shrinker allows GPU waits and write-back,
> (typically from kswapd), perform multiple passes, skipping
> subsequent passes if the shrinker number of scanned objects target
> is reached.
>
> 1) Without GPU waits and write-back
> 2) Without write-back
> 3) With both GPU-waits and write-back
>
> This is to avoid stalls and costly write- and readbacks unless they
> are really necessary.
>
> v2:
> - Don't test for scan completion twice. (Stuart Summers)
> - Update tags.
>
> Reported-by: melvyn <melvyn2@dnsense.pub>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/5557
> Cc: Summers Stuart <stuart.summers@intel.com>
> Fixes: 00c8efc3180f ("drm/xe: Add a shrinker for xe bos")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Changes look good to me, thanks Thomas. Before merging, please address
the feedback from Matt as well.
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Thanks,
Stuart
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_shrinker.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> --
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_shrinker.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_shrinker.c
> index 1c3c04d52f55..90244fe59b59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_shrinker.c
> @@ -54,10 +54,10 @@ xe_shrinker_mod_pages(struct xe_shrinker
> *shrinker, long shrinkable, long purgea
> write_unlock(&shrinker->lock);
> }
>
> -static s64 xe_shrinker_walk(struct xe_device *xe,
> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> - const struct xe_bo_shrink_flags flags,
> - unsigned long to_scan, unsigned long
> *scanned)
> +static s64 __xe_shrinker_walk(struct xe_device *xe,
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> + const struct xe_bo_shrink_flags flags,
> + unsigned long to_scan, unsigned long
> *scanned)
> {
> unsigned int mem_type;
> s64 freed = 0, lret;
> @@ -93,6 +93,48 @@ static s64 xe_shrinker_walk(struct xe_device *xe,
> return freed;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Try shrinking idle objects without writeback first, then if not
> sufficient,
> + * try also non-idle objects and finally if that's not sufficient
> either,
> + * add writeback. This avoids stalls and explicit writebacks with
> light or
> + * moderate memory pressure.
> + */
> +static s64 xe_shrinker_walk(struct xe_device *xe,
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> + const struct xe_bo_shrink_flags flags,
> + unsigned long to_scan, unsigned long
> *scanned)
> +{
> + bool no_wait_gpu = true;
> + struct xe_bo_shrink_flags save_flags = flags;
> + s64 lret, freed;
> +
> + swap(no_wait_gpu, ctx->no_wait_gpu);
> + save_flags.writeback = false;
> + lret = __xe_shrinker_walk(xe, ctx, save_flags, to_scan,
> scanned);
> + swap(no_wait_gpu, ctx->no_wait_gpu);
> + if (lret < 0 || *scanned >= to_scan)
> + return lret;
> +
> + freed = lret;
> + if (!ctx->no_wait_gpu) {
> + lret = __xe_shrinker_walk(xe, ctx, save_flags,
> to_scan, scanned);
> + if (lret < 0)
> + return lret;
> + freed += lret;
> + if (*scanned >= to_scan)
> + return freed;
> + }
> +
> + if (flags.writeback) {
> + lret = __xe_shrinker_walk(xe, ctx, flags, to_scan,
> scanned);
> + if (lret < 0)
> + return lret;
> + freed += lret;
> + }
> +
> + return freed;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long
> xe_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control
> *sc)
> {
> @@ -199,6 +241,7 @@ static unsigned long xe_shrinker_scan(struct
> shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_con
> runtime_pm = xe_shrinker_runtime_pm_get(shrinker,
> true, 0, can_backup);
>
> shrink_flags.purge = false;
> +
> lret = xe_shrinker_walk(shrinker->xe, &ctx, shrink_flags,
> nr_to_scan, &nr_scanned);
> if (lret >= 0)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 7:48 [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Defer buffer object shrinker write-backs and GPU waits Thomas Hellström
2025-08-05 13:40 ` Matthew Auld
2025-08-05 14:50 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4bb385f0f5ff5d40337cafb28dbd7d489758c586.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=melvyn2@dnsense.pub \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox