Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Frode Isaksen <fisaksen@baylibre.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frode Isaksen <frode@meta.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: check that event count does not exceed event buffer length
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:12:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d9226a9-d89d-4441-9dbf-f76ebce49a9e@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401233625.6jtsauyqkzqej3uj@synopsys.com>



On 4/2/2025 5:06 AM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Frode,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/1/2025 5:38 PM, Frode Isaksen wrote:
>>> On 4/1/25 7:43 AM, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/28/2025 4:14 PM, Frode Isaksen wrote:
>>>>> From: Frode Isaksen <frode@meta.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The event count is read from register DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT.
>>>>> There is a check for the count being zero, but not for exceeding the
>>>>> event buffer length.
>>>>> Check that event count does not exceed event buffer length,
>>>>> avoiding an out-of-bounds access when memcpy'ing the event.
>>>>> Crash log:
>>>>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>>>>> ffffffc0129be000
>>>>> pc : __memcpy+0x114/0x180
>>>>> lr : dwc3_check_event_buf+0xec/0x348
>>>>> x3 : 0000000000000030 x2 : 000000000000dfc4
>>>>> x1 : ffffffc0129be000 x0 : ffffff87aad60080
>>>>> Call trace:
>>>>> __memcpy+0x114/0x180
>>>>> dwc3_interrupt+0x24/0x34
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frode Isaksen <frode@meta.com>
>>>>> Fixes: ebbb2d59398f ("usb: dwc3: gadget: use evt->cache for
>>>>> processing events")
>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v1 -> v2: Added Fixes and Cc tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> This bug was discovered, tested and fixed (no more crashes seen)
>>>>> on Meta Quest 3 device.
>>>>> Also tested on T.I. AM62x board.
>>>>>
>>>>>    drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 2 +-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>>> index 63fef4a1a498..548e112167f3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>>>> @@ -4564,7 +4564,7 @@ static irqreturn_t
>>>>> dwc3_check_event_buf(struct dwc3_event_buffer *evt)
>>>>>          count = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT(0));
>>>>>        count &= DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT_MASK;
>>>>> -    if (!count)
>>>>> +    if (!count || count > evt->length)
>>>>>            return IRQ_NONE;
>>>>>          evt->count = count;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I did see this issue previously ([1] on 5.10) on SAR2130 (upstreamed
>>>> recently). Can you help check if the issue is same on your end if
>>>> you can reproduce it easily. Thinh also provided some debug pointers
>>>> to check suspecting it to be a HW issue.
>>>
>>> Seems to be exactly the same issue, and your fix looks OK as well. I'm
>>> happy to abandon my patch and let yo provide the fix.
>>>
>>
>> NAK. I tried to skip copying data beyond 4K which is not the right approach.
>> Thinh was tending more towards your line of code changes. So your code looks
>> fine, but an error log indicating the presence of this issue might be
>> helpful.
>>
>>> Note that I am not able to reproduce this locally and it happens very
>>> seldom.
>>>
>>
>> It was very hard to reproduce this issue. Only two instances reported on
>> SAR2130 on my end.
>>
> 
> I still wonder what's current behavior of the HW to properly respond
> here. If the device is dead, register read often returns all Fs, which
> may be the case you're seeing here. If so, we should properly prevent
> the driver from accessing the device and properly teardown the driver.
> 
> If this is a momentary bleep/lost of power in the device, perhaps your
> change here is sufficient and the driver can continue to access the
> device.
> 
> With the difficulty of reproducing this issue, can you confirm that the
> device still operates properly after this change?

Unfortunately, I did not test this particular change of returning when 
ev count is invalid. I stress tested the change of copying only 4K [1], 
but didn't see any issue. I suspect we didn't hit the issue later again 
in the course of 14 day testing.

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230521100330.22478-1-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com/

Regards,
Krishna,



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-02  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-28 10:44 [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: check that event count does not exceed event buffer length Frode Isaksen
2025-04-01  5:43 ` Krishna Kurapati
2025-04-01 12:08   ` Frode Isaksen
2025-04-01 12:26     ` Krishna Kurapati
2025-04-01 23:36       ` Thinh Nguyen
2025-04-02  4:42         ` Krishna Kurapati [this message]
2025-04-02  7:50           ` Frode Isaksen
2025-04-02 22:22             ` Thinh Nguyen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-01 12:53 Frode Isaksen
2025-04-01 13:49 ` Greg KH
2025-04-01 23:43 ` Thinh Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d9226a9-d89d-4441-9dbf-f76ebce49a9e@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=fisaksen@baylibre.com \
    --cc=frode@meta.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox