From: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Ronald Wahl <rwahl@gmx.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ks8851: Fix deadlock with the SPI chip variant
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:22:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e4fad0c-c7bf-4b64-a30f-489c5dc4875c@raritan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f3c0444-c02a-4fff-8648-d053a0cb21a2@raritan.com>
On 06.07.24 10:38, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> On 06.07.24 02:39, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 19:47:56 +0200 Ronald Wahl wrote:
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_spi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_spi.c
>>> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t ks8851_start_xmit_spi(struct
>>> sk_buff *skb,
>>> netif_dbg(ks, tx_queued, ks->netdev,
>>> "%s: skb %p, %d@%p\n", __func__, skb, skb->len, skb->data);
>>>
>>> - spin_lock(&ks->statelock);
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&ks->statelock);
>>>
>>> if (ks->queued_len + needed > ks->tx_space) {
>>> netif_stop_queue(dev);
>>> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t ks8851_start_xmit_spi(struct
>>> sk_buff *skb,
>>> skb_queue_tail(&ks->txq, skb);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - spin_unlock(&ks->statelock);
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&ks->statelock);
>>
>> this one probably can stay as spin_lock() since networking stack only
>> calls xmit in BH context.
>
> I already suspected this it was more a mental hint here. I will remove it.
>
>> But I see 2 other spin_lock(statelock) in the
>> driver which I'm not as sure about. Any taking of this lock has to be
>> _bh() unless you're sure the caller is already in BH.
>
> The other two instances are not in BH context as far as I know but also
> do not interfere with BH. The one in ks8861_tx_work protects only
> variable assignments used only inside the driver and the one in
> ks8851_set_rx_mode also only does some driver local variable stuff and a
> schedule_work which as far as I know has nothing to do with BH because
> workqueues are running in process context. Am I wrong here?
I guess I found a misunderstanding on my side: I was assuming that a
softirq cannot asynchronously interrupt a spin lock protected section. Maybe
this is wrong. In the one place where I'm waking the queue again the
spin_lock_bh avoids synchronously triggering the BH processing while still
holding a spinlock.
I will use the _bh variants on the two other places.
- ron
________________________________
Ce message, ainsi que tous les fichiers joints à ce message, peuvent contenir des informations sensibles et/ ou confidentielles ne devant pas être divulguées. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire de ce message (ou que vous recevez ce message par erreur), nous vous remercions de le notifier immédiatement à son expéditeur, et de détruire ce message. Toute copie, divulgation, modification, utilisation ou diffusion, non autorisée, directe ou indirecte, de tout ou partie de ce message, est strictement interdite.
This e-mail, and any document attached hereby, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect, copying, disclosure, distribution or other use of the material or parts thereof is strictly forbidden.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-06 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 17:47 [PATCH v2] net: ks8851: Fix deadlock with the SPI chip variant Ronald Wahl
2024-07-06 0:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-06 8:38 ` Ronald Wahl
2024-07-06 9:22 ` Ronald Wahl [this message]
2024-07-06 9:27 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e4fad0c-c7bf-4b64-a30f-489c5dc4875c@raritan.com \
--to=ronald.wahl@raritan.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rwahl@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox