From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] time: Revert ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK compile time optimizaitons
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51784DF9.7010302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP12_auNLogaK0J8yj7_Nhf=B+Anh9NVNGTM3TqT15OKRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/24/2013 12:44 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:32 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Kay Sievers noted that the ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK config,
>> which enables some minor compile time optimization to avoid
>> uncessary code in mostly the suspend/resume path could cause
>> problems for userland.
>>
>> In particular, the dependency for RTC_HCTOSYS on
>> !ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK, which avoids setting the time
>> twice and simplifies suspend/resume, has the side effect
>> of causing the /sys/class/rtc/rtcN/hctosys flag to always be
>> zero, and this flag is commonly used by udev to setup the
>> /dev/rtc symlink to /dev/rtcN, which can cause pain for
>> older applications.
> An alternative to reverting this could be to set that flag
> unconditionally on the rtc that matches the persistent clock the
> kernel uses internally?
>
> I mean regardless of the pretty weird config option
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE, which internally just does a strcmp() with
> the given device name when the flag is queried. :)
>
> Can't we just have the same interface and your original optimization
> on x86, even without CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE enabled at all?
This might be possible, but I'd rather it be part of the unification
work w/ the persistent_clock and the RTC code, rather then a quick hack.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 18:32 [PATCH] time: Revert ALWAYS_USE_PERSISTENT_CLOCK compile time optimizaitons John Stultz
2013-04-24 18:41 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 18:55 ` John Stultz
2013-04-24 19:18 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 21:24 ` John Stultz
2013-04-25 23:22 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 19:44 ` Kay Sievers
2013-04-24 21:26 ` John Stultz [this message]
2013-04-25 6:30 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51784DF9.7010302@linaro.org \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox