Re: [RFC PATCH] timekeeping: Correct run-time detection of real-time clock.

[John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>]

On 05/17/2013 11:24 AM, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> Since commit <31ade30692dc9680bfc95700d794818fa3f754ac>, timekeeping_init()
> checks for presence of persistent clock by attempting to read a non-zero
> time value from real-time clock. This is an issue on platforms where
> persistent_clock (instead of a RTC) is implemented as a free-running counter
> starting from zero on each boot and running during suspend. Examples are some
> ARM platforms (e.g. PandaBoard). An attempt to read such a clock during
> timekeeping_init() may return zero value and falsely declare persistent clock
> as missing. Additionally, in the above case suspend times may be accounted
> twice (once from timekeeping_resume() and once from rtc_resume()), resulting
> in a gradual drift of system time.
>
> This patch does a run-time correction of the issue by doing the same check
> during timekeeping_suspend().
>
> A better long-term solution would have to return error when trying to read
> non-existing clock and zero when trying to read an uninitialized clock, but
> that would require changing all persistent_clock implementations.
>
> This patch addresses the immediate breakage, for now.
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>

Thanks for finding and sending this out!  I'll queue this for 3.10.

thanks again
-john