From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:36:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ACC60B.8090504@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ACBD6A.1030304@candelatech.com>
On 06/03/2013 08:59 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 07:17 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>
>>>> Hi Rusty,
>>>>
>>>> I had pointed Ben (offlist) to that bugzilla entry without realizing
>>>> there were other earlier related fixes in this space. Re-viewing bz-
>>>> 58011, it looks like it was opened against 3.8.12, while Ben and myself
>>>> had encountered module loading problems in versions 3.9 and
>>>> 3.9.[1-3]. I can update the bugzilla entry to add a comment noting commit
>>>> a49b7e82 "kobject: fix kset_find_obj() race with concurrent last
>>>> kobject_put()".
>>>>
>>>> That said, it doesn't appear that commit 944a1fa "module: don't unlink the
>>>> module until we've removed all exposure" has not made it into any stable
>>>> kernel. On my system, applying this on top of 3.9 resolved a module
>>>> unload/load race that would occasionally occur on boot (two video adapters
>>>> of the same make, the module unloads for whatever reason and I see "module
>>>> is already loaded" and "sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
>>>> '/module/mgag200'" messages every 5-10% instances.) I have logs if you
>>>> were interested in these warnings/crashes.
>
> It at least works around the problem for me as well. But, a more rare
> migration/[0-3] (I think) related lockup still exists in 3.9.4 for me,
> so I will also try applying that other kobject patch and continue testing
> today...
Well, that other kobject patch is already in 3.9.4, so I think it's still
a good idea to include the
"module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure."
patch in stable. I have a decent test case to reproduce the crash, so if someone
wants me to test other patches instead, then I will do so.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51A8E884.1080009@candelatech.com>
[not found] ` <87ehclumhr.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306022212200.10003@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306030724230.19647@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>
2013-06-03 14:17 ` Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 15:59 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-03 16:36 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-06-04 4:37 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04 5:56 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04 14:07 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:50 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-04 17:45 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 4:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-05 7:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 16:59 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 18:48 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 19:11 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 19:31 ` stop_machine lockup issue in 3.9.y Ben Greear
2013-06-05 20:58 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 21:33 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 1:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 3:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:41 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 3:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:50 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 4:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 20:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 21:15 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 21:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 3:29 ` Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Rusty Russell
2013-06-05 5:07 ` Greg KH
2013-06-05 7:13 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ACC60B.8090504@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox